Rangers Thread - 2023/24
- Thread starter MAG
- Start date
jimharri
Moderator
And don't forget the cultists losing today. 117.
Magicpole
Well-Known Member
Tavenier takes his 567th penalty for Rangers. Another one awarded because Dallas loves the Gers. Another one to add to the nobody else would get that, penalty. Currentiy in the hundreds and rising every game they need a boost.
eyalluvitt
Well-Known Member
Yet Rangers have been awarded less penalties than ra shellik this season
There you go again with those pesky facts
Remember they are still the only team awarded a penalty for an accidental clash of heads. Those pesky facts again
eyalluvitt
Well-Known Member
How many of the last 10 OF penalties have been awarded to Eyal Berkovic’s favourite Glasgow team?
Not sure which Glasgow team Eyal prefers
Rangers have had ONE penalty at Parkhead in the last 20+ years.
If yesterday’s performance from the officials is anything to go by we are in for an extremely tough run in.
Magicpole
Well-Known Member
That doesn’t change the data as much as you woukd hope. In fact, it could make it worse. We start asking questions, we start compiling evidence and suddenly we get more penalties?
The question anyone looking will ask will be, why now? We all know why now, and it is the reaction of people being found out giving us more, so you can make that statement.
If there is a spike then that needs examined. It only makes it more suspicious.
The pressure of the club to commission a similar snd in fact deeper examination will show you outstrip everyone in decisions, times of decisions etc. it can’t be hidden.
If only Cheatin Beaton hadn’t said you going 124 games without a penalty against you, isn’t an anomaly that cannot be explained. It has been snd it’s going to get even more sticky.
Looking forward to it. After we send it to UEFA, I wonder what they will do. It’s over the last five or six seasons and you Buck the probabilities too much. It’s unreal the second best team, who have scored far jess goals, created far less chances, have had less touches in opposition box get, apart from, quick they’re onto us, give the cunts a few penalties,this year, you are so far in front, the ref should just start the game with a penalty to you. Saves time.
The numbers/truth will set you free. Not you, us. And I for one can’t wait. The case has already been proven. Our MSM, your friends, refuse to go with it.
What do you think the response would be if it were us?
Front page need in the written press and first story on our news for days. You? There’s nothing to see because we don’t want to see it.
You’re fucked if our board grow a pair. There is a move also to get shareholders to vote for action on the data to be taken by the club. Guess how I am going to vote?
It will settle it. If you are sure you are so hard done by, you shouldn’t have a problem, but, you will won’t you?
eyalluvitt
Well-Known Member
In an effort to finally get a decision go their way in an OF game, Rangers are to wear a special kit this weekend
Looks a penalty to me. Not as clear cut as I thought it was going to be but a Penalty
You are looking at isolated incidents. The worst decision in the Livi v Rangers game you’ve highlighted was the disallowed McCausland goal. Still to this day I’ve no idea where the foul is supposed to be.
That’s one dodgy penalty decision that’s gone against you ALL season!! Ffs the last penalty you lot got against Hearts was as clear cut a dive as you’ll ever see!!
Speaking on Ref Watch, he said: "When I saw this I thought really, really harsh but when I saw the replay when it goes to the VAR, absolutely right. And what I would also say - also a yellow card. Flailing arm, catches him in the face. Credit to VAR because when I saw it first of all I didn't think foul. When I see the replay, definitely a foul."
And here’s a still picture which makes me question whether it could have been more than a yellow. According to that fucking crackpot Michael Stewart the Hibs player only has eyes for the ball…picture says otherwise!!
And here’s a still picture which makes me question whether it could have been more than a yellow. According to that fucking crackpot Michael Stewart the Hibs player only has eyes for the ball…picture says otherwise!!
Magicpole
Well-Known Member
The refs in our country are a fucking joke, I think I may have hinted at that from time to time.
Still don’t think that’s a penalty, more of one than Iwata got done for, but not for me.
I can’t remember seeing a referee looking as lost as Dickinson was on Saturday. It wasn’t so much the major decisions.
One example difficult to explain but I’ll try. Ball goes into Hibs box. It’s knocked clear and going out for a Rangers throw in at the corner flag. Just as the ball is about to go out of play , with no one near ball, he blows for a head injury. He takes the ball off Rangers and gives Hibs the free drop ball. This happened 5 or 6 times during the game.
I don’t believe referees cheat in the true sense of the word BUT if you see the same incidents as I do and if it’s 50/50 I’ll guarantee, more often than not, we ll disagree on the decision.
OK I’ll make an exception. I do think Kevin Clancy is biased.
There’s nothing wrong with VAR just those who operate it. It’ll never be perfect but has to be better