It wasn't "panic", it wasn't "human error", it was "making sure" of, or "affecting" the result.Pity PGMOL can't control their officials (Or maybe theycanDO.)
I've not seen an apology to City in respect of last week's Liverpool game. Any links anyone, please?And they received a full explanation and apology from all involved!!!?
And, so did we against Liverpool last week!
None of those excuse will cut what was at stake. Lost 2 points could be the fine margin come end of the season. We are taking about few millions . Now who is going to compensate for the loss?I’ve seen loads of excuses.
“He thought Jack was offside”
“He panicked”
“He changed his mind”
If any of them were true he needs sacking for being a useless sack of shit.
He also needs sacking for being a corrupt ****.
It’s only City though so he doesn’t even miss a game.
When it comes to that cosy little mafia, closed shop cabal known as PIGMOL they don't half get defensive when they make clear and obvious mistakes. One might jump to the conclusion that they're hiding something heaven forbid. First thing I'd introduce as a regulator would be to put an end to their shady syndicate.I've just watched MotD2 on the iplayer and the Sky discussion on Youtube. There seemed agreement on Sky that Hooper had been the victim of panic. Which raises the question of whether the refs chosen for PL games have enough of the right kind of experience for this level or whether the right candidates are selected. It has to be remembered that this referee has been responsible for three howlers already, (but only disciplined for two of them). But it was Jenas who made the most telling point on MotD2. He argued that the only possible reason for blowing the whistle as the belief either that Jack was offside OR that Erling's pass was straight to Porro. But referee's are instructed only to blow when the outcome is clear ie when Porro had received the ball or Jack had scored and a VAR check could allow the goal or rule it out. This doesn't answer the question of whether Hooper was incompetent (AGAIN) or bent but it does tell us quite clearly that the decision was a shocker. Now City must control their players. Pity PGMOL can't control their officials (Or maybe they can.)
The painfully obvious explanation is that someone other than Hooper made that decision, and on the balance of probabilities the obvious answer is usually the truth.If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck it’s a duck!
That was one of the most blatant examples of corruption I have seen, it’s quite obvious what the game is this season
They don’t give a shit unless it happens to anyone playing in red.None of those excuse will cut what was at stake. Lost 2 points could be the fine margin come end of the season. We are taking about few millions . Now who is going to compensate for the loss?