Gray
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 May 2004
- Messages
- 28,818
- Team supported
- ABU & The Bus Wreckers
He should have sent off Douglas Luiz, but bottled it.
He might have thought the first booking was a tad harsh, which in comparison to some he let go it was.He should have sent off Douglas Luiz, but bottled it.
In between Foden's 2nd and 3rd goals he went on a bit of a mazy run bearing straight towards goal and into the area, it came to nothing as he was crowded out by about 4 defenders, but when he went down he held his face and stayed down.On the first point, I think referees have a difficult job in that respect. We're all aware of tragic instances where players have dropped to the ground and have been seriously ill; imagine the furore if the referee did not show concern and allowed play to continue. I think the responsibility for avoiding that lies with the players. Similarly, their dropping to the ground when a finger/arm brushes their head, as if struck by a haymaker, is poor form.
I've stopped calling them out to my few none City friends as they use the 'you won anyway line'.I thought he was atrocious last night, bought every fake injury from them and for their goal missed a blatant foul which gave them the ball and allowed them to break to score, it will get ignored because we won well but i thought he was still crap.
Maybe change the rules so that when a player goes down holding his head & the ref has to stop the game to check on the player, then the clubs physio automatically has to go & check on the player too. This would mean the ‘injured’ player then has to go off the pitch & has to wait to be called back on by the ref like any other time a player needs the physio.Don’t disagree that something could be done, such as keeping the treated player off the park for 3-5 minutes, but then you might have players staying on when actually injured, and that‘s not to be encouraged. Referees get enough stick, much deserved, but ultimately players will always test the laws and, in turn, our patience.
If he thought it was too harsh why did he do it? Inconsistency personifiedHe might have thought the first booking was a tad harsh, which in comparison to some he let go it was.
How he gave that freekick against Grealish was ridiculous, a mistake compounded by then having the temerity to book him for remonstrating. Think Grealish was looking around for the 'You've Been Framed' cameras.
Don’t disagree that something could be done, such as keeping the treated player off the park for 3-5 minutes, but then you might have players staying on when actually injured, and that‘s not to be encouraged. Referees get enough stick, much deserved, but ultimately players will always test the laws and, in turn, our patience.
I was only guessing. The only consistent thing about referees is their inconsistency.If he thought it was too harsh why did he do it? Inconsistency personified
Thought he had a shit first half, but sending Douglas Luiz off would've been very harsh
Surprised there aren't many calling out the clear foul on Alvarez, seeing as Villa scored straight from it. Is there a time limit for VAR intervention in these cases? By my watch it was less than 20 seconds from foul to goal
I missed it (cutting a pizza up in the kitchen) and haven't seen a replay, was it a reasonable shout for a pen in your opinion?Conspiracy theorists out in force moaning about the incident that was obviously not a penalty.
Go look at RAWK.Tierney is still a **** even though we won.
PiGMOL directive to allow teams to kick us with impunity.
Our players seemed nervous in case he booked/sent off any of ours retaliating.