The cards for dissent were all towards the start of the season, there have been comparatively few in the last few months, probably going back to the same sort of levels as we have seen for the seasons preceding this one, that's why I think that using the United fans tweet as proof of the partisan nature of football fans isn't a good example because yellows for dissent have all but stopped for all teams now.
I see that you don't think the referee had a great game but that isn't what I asked, do you think he applied the laws of the game fairly and equally to both teams?
I disagree that the crowd got yellow cards for Caicedo and their keeper, their own actions did. If the home crowd had affected the referees decisions then City would have had 3 penalties and they would have been down 10, or possibly 9 men depending on if the keeper carried on time-wasting, men before the end of the game. If you think that the crowd pressured the referee into giving those two cards out then aren't you essentially saying the crowd had to pressure the referee into making the correct decision? Or do you think the yellow cards given to Caicedo and their keeper were wrong decisions?