meltonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 May 2013
- Messages
- 6,681
I think it would have been, yes. And either way it’s ridiculous.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Ref Watch
- Thread starter Chi-town blues
- Start date
I think it would have been, yes. And either way it’s ridiculous.
Cotontoquinn
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Jul 2020
- Messages
- 2,741
- Team supported
- Manchester City
The refereeing today was AWFUL. I’ve been a blue for 40+ years and I do think there is a conscious bias - absolutely yes.Honestly, I've been a blue for 40+ years and do I think there is a conscious bias - no, absolutely not.
Do I think all teams get rough decisions which VAR was meant to help eliminate? Yep.
Guys need to get a grip. It's verging on embarrassing to think that every shit decision is a deliberate attempt to deprive us.
The number of totally dreadful fouls committed against City that go unpunished is ridiculous. Today was just another example.
I think it would have been, yes. And either way it’s ridiculous.
not a chance in hell we get given as a pen
shevtheblue
Well-Known Member
Even by the rules that wasn't a pen. There is no way they can read the rule and see that as a pen, its not unnatural and he's got his back to the fucking ball. They're either completely incompetent or fucking cheats, take ya pick.
- touches the ball with their hand/arm when it has made their body unnaturally bigger. A player is considered to have made their body unnaturally bigger when the position of their hand/arm is not a consequence of, or justifiable by, the player’s body movement for that specific situation. By having their hand/arm in such a position, the player takes a risk of their hand/arm being hit by the ball and being penalised
The refereeing today was AWFUL. I’ve been a blue for 40+ years and I do think there is a conscious bias - absolutely yes.
The number of totally dreadful fouls committed against City that go unpunished is ridiculous. Today was just another example.
How sweet does it feel we still went on and beat the system and united in a FA Cup final
meltonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 May 2013
- Messages
- 6,681
not a chance in hell we get given as a pen
There’s been way too many handballs given like that this season for me to think we would, it’s been an absurd application of the law all year.
Pep knows, you don't.Honestly, I've been a blue for 40+ years and do I think there is a conscious bias - no, absolutely not.
Do I think all teams get rough decisions which VAR was meant to help eliminate? Yep.
Guys need to get a grip. It's verging on embarrassing to think that every shit decision is a deliberate attempt to deprive us.
The foul on kev has been eradicated from history. casemiro and fred allowed to kick the fuck out of us. We all predicted it, the odds we have to overcome are ridiculous, and yet we keep doing it.
"15 v 11 and the blues still win, the boys in blue never ever give in".
One fucking more lads.
"15 v 11 and the blues still win, the boys in blue never ever give in".
One fucking more lads.
Last edited:
Even by the rules that wasn't a pen. There is no way they can read the rule and see that as a pen, its not unnatural and he's got his back to the fucking ball. They're either completely incompetent or fucking cheats, take ya pick.
- touches the ball with their hand/arm when it has made their body unnaturally bigger. A player is considered to have made their body unnaturally bigger when the position of their hand/arm is not a consequence of, or justifiable by, the player’s body movement for that specific situation. By having their hand/arm in such a position, the player takes a risk of their hand/arm being hit by the ball and being penalised
Ball to hand is not a pen when you know nothing about it