BingoI think it’s a case of ‘if it’s on De Bruyne, by a player in a red shirt, don’t give it.”
BingoI think it’s a case of ‘if it’s on De Bruyne, by a player in a red shirt, don’t give it.”
The way he steps across him, I’m pretty certain it was intentional. Plus he has a habit of stamping on anklesI thought Jenas said he thought that it was deliberate, but didn't say more than that.
Was you running backwards and jumping while looking at a ball moving through the air then stretching every sinue in your body to reach said ball?It really isn't though. If I do a 180 turn in mid air, my arms don't flail out (I just tried it! )
I think this is correct there use to be a VAR handbook online I can’t find it now The ref will tell VAR what he saw and why he gave his decision if VAR feels there’s clear and obvious error he will ask the ref to check the monitor where he will show him an alternative angle, I’m going now that if he’s still not convinced he will show him additional viewsReally? So if the VAR ref has 2 angles of an incident, one angle shows a potential foul & the other shows it probably wasn’t, the VAR ref gets to choose what images the on pitch ref sees?
That doesn’t sound plausible, so can you verify how you know this to be true please mate as it sounds like you’re saying the VAR ref is making the decisions instead of the in field ref?
The same referee in the same match gives that decision against us at the other end.I wouldn’t go that far, think it’s a some will give it, some won’t.
Eh. You cant kick a player to stop them getting to the ball. If you watch that back and dont see it as a foul/penalty, you’re a clown!!
The same referee in the same match gives that decision against us at the other end.
It's still inconsistent though, only the reasoning differs.Maybe so. That’s a different point though!
It's still inconsistent though, only the reasoning differs.