cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,670
If people’s minds are made up that it’s A) then I don’t think they can be swayed
B) more likely for me - but with a massive BUT … let’s not forget how tough it is for officials - the play acting, the pressure from the crowd, players appealing everything, the speed of the game, how so many decisions are fractional margins and how subjective decisions will always be - even most weeks pundits agree/disagree on decisions
Also to add everything is more heightened now than ever with social media and talking about refs decisions 24/7 - may only be a couple of bad decisions across all the games but it’s made to feel like all games are being reffed outrageously and getting everything wrong- which isn’t the case
However, no denying some appalling decisions of late, Rashford offside and the Brentford penalty decision and more these last few weeks
C) there’s been a few over the years that I’m sure have enjoyed the limelight and being centre of attention , Riley springs to mind and Clattenburg - but I don’t think majority want to be classed as a ‘corrupt ****’ just for wanting attention
So I’ll sway with B out of them options
Being swayed by the crowd is actually corruption.
You are giving a decision to please the masses for your benefit.
Your job is to perform in difficult circumstances & apply the rules that you see. Using assistants & VAR to support you.
So giving a decision at Anfield to Liverpool that you wouldn’t give at Craven cottage because of the ferocity of the crowd & not being held to account by your management team is 100% corruption.
Adding to that Commentators & newspapers giving a different opinion or even highlighting it depending which team/players is also corruption. This has been used many times to get players banned before important games & was the type of tactic exposed when Juventus were relegated years ago.
Referees have spoken about how they were disciplined by giving decisions against Ferguson / United. Nothing formally but opportunities didn’t come up, passive aggressive & their response once off the naughty step was to never make the same mistake again. The mistake may have been applying the LOTG.