Refereeing decisions...

dref619 said:
mat said:
Some truly shite refereeing this weekend.

3 major talking points is a strange coincidence.

it's every fucking week. the standard of refereeing in this league is truly shocking .

i honestly believe the majority of them should be fucked off and they should start again.

fucking rubbish

People that question everything may ask as the league is wrapped up they need something else to keep viewing figures up.
 
They are frightened to death, to much pressure, if they don't let things go the way they should then they are looking over their shoulders, Riley should be sacked at the end of the season, someone with ethics and morals should be brought in, someone who is not corrupted by certain influences in the corridors if the fa!
 
dref619 said:
mat said:
Some truly shite refereeing this weekend.

3 major talking points is a strange coincidence.

it's every fucking week. the standard of refereeing in this league is truly shocking .

i honestly believe the majority of them should be fucked off and they should start again.

fucking rubbish
The Premier League use the same faces game after game so they are obviously happy with all these mistakes made.

Complicit then.
 
mat said:
djimaldblue said:
Does anyone honestly actually think that referees are biased against City?
Over the season the good and bad decisions even each other out.
The refs are professionals who are assessed after each match, It's not in their interest to favour one team over another.
Sure they make mistakes but to presume there is an agenda is just being daft.

Not against us personally. Ever since Professional refs were created it became a way of control.

The damage was done at the start of the season. United won their games against Arsenal, dipperpool, Chelski with the aid of controversial red cards.

The Premier league is run as a business and they wish to protect their product. Their biggest brand is the scum, they would rather keep the staus quo than have a competitive league which some clubs will collaborate with as long as their revenue stream isn't affected (see Arsenal).
this is 100% correct, they just decided that it was too close last year so they got their help early this year to build up a huge lead, it was so early that only fans of city or utd would remember. The league is bent.
 
ballinio said:
mat said:
djimaldblue said:
Does anyone honestly actually think that referees are biased against City?
Over the season the good and bad decisions even each other out.
The refs are professionals who are assessed after each match, It's not in their interest to favour one team over another.
Sure they make mistakes but to presume there is an agenda is just being daft.

Not against us personally. Ever since Professional refs were created it became a way of control.

The damage was done at the start of the season. United won their games against Arsenal, dipperpool, Chelski with the aid of controversial red cards.

The Premier league is run as a business and they wish to protect their product. Their biggest brand is the scum, they would rather keep the staus quo than have a competitive league which some clubs will collaborate with as long as their revenue stream isn't affected (see Arsenal).
this is 100% correct, they just decided that it was too close last year so they got their help early this year to build up a huge lead, it was so early that only fans of city or utd would remember. The league is bent.

correct.
 
What pisses me off is one week refs are waving cards for softest tackles you see, then the next week the same refs are waving play on for leg breakers, ie Chris Foy sends Kompany off for a two footed tackle, yet this season lets
Valencia off with out even a booking for a two footed lunge verse Sunderland .
 
de niro said:
ballinio said:
mat said:
Not against us personally. Ever since Professional refs were created it became a way of control.

The damage was done at the start of the season. United won their games against Arsenal, dipperpool, Chelski with the aid of controversial red cards.

The Premier league is run as a business and they wish to protect their product. Their biggest brand is the scum, they would rather keep the staus quo than have a competitive league which some clubs will collaborate with as long as their revenue stream isn't affected (see Arsenal).
this is 100% correct, they just decided that it was too close last year so they got their help early this year to build up a huge lead, it was so early that only fans of city or utd would remember. The league is bent.

correct.

I fear I may be being clarkied here however I still will answer as if the above is serious.

I've always believed united have had the rub of the green and refs are very scared of fergie etc however to blame referees for our shocking defense of our title is laughable.

We have played poorly for the majority of the season you could count on one hand the number of times we have been as brilliant as our expensively assembled squad should be.

If all this agenda stuff is true then what is the reason we were absolute dog shit in the champions league? The referees didn't get in the way of us did they? If its all the FA and their agenda against us why did we not win a game in a different competition with a different organisation?

Last year the refs were against us apparently and they were all pro united and we still managed to win the league so goes to show it can be done with that apparent bias against us.
 
They are biased in favour of Man Utd - massively so and when you're competing against them you become very aware of it
 
I don't think the FA or refs are bias against us or for utd, but when you see shit like last week ferdinand vs Torres off the ball caught on camera and nothing is done , yet any other player would be looking at a 3/4 match ban, it make's you think !
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.