MillionMilesAway
Well-Known Member
I stand corrected, still it's a rubbish rule change.
It's certainly very odd!
I guess it's the effect of the concept of 'becoming active' or however it's termed.
I stand corrected, still it's a rubbish rule change.
As an aside, there's something really odd with the scheduling of refs. Oliver has had Liverpool 5 times so far I think, and twice in a month with the recent cup tie vs United.
Was it only 11? Seemed longer than that, fair enough. I'd prefer Clattenburg to Mason, mind, and I think Clattenburg isn't a great ref.
As you say, well have to see on Taylor.
I agree with the basis of the argument though that in the past refs have gone missing for Ferguson and others.
As an aside, there's something really odd with the scheduling of refs. Oliver has had Liverpool 5 times so far I think, and twice in a month with the recent cup tie vs United.
Can retrospective action be taken against Kyle Walker for the push on sterling, which it seems to be universally agreed was a red card offence ?
Presumably the ref did not see it and that's why he took no action ? Or does this rule only apply in the case of violent conduct ?
It's a disgrace that either are allowed near a whistle at all.It's an ongoing disgrace that either Taylor or Mason is allowed anywhere near either the Etihad or the Swamp, given their "allegiances"
It's a disgrace that either are allowed near a whistle at all.
It's a disgrace that either are allowed near a whistle at all.
Yes, I agree, now. I remember the rule change coming in and being discussed somewhere. From my view towards the corner, I thought Sergio had picked it up in their half.This. The line I quoted a few posts above explicitly allows for this.
I didn't know until I looked, it's hardly a surprise that most in the ground didn't.
I know, the 4-1 game came to me as I was halfway through the message.We have been done by officials in 3 out of he last 4 games against Spurs by astonishing decisions.