Referees/Officials

  • Thread starter Thread starter blueinsa
  • Start date Start date
How dare Pep treat the 'journalists' like they are stupid!?

More like how dare the 'journalists' abuse out hospitality and conspire to fabricate nonsense against City with undertones of racism. Which they've been doing since 2008. Honestly at boiling point with them. Fucking hate them all.
 
Why would I be upset? You were just being you. Expecting you to not be swimming against the tide in a thread like this would be like expecting Mike Dean to try and have a quiet game, it would be madness.

You will find I have not commented on the refereeing performance because regardless of my opinion it will be used as a brush to attack me. It seems you have found something anyway.

Just found the thought of having 109 points amusing in one season.
 
I'm not even sure he was all that bad. Crowd were going to crucify him at any chance after he sent of Fernandinho, which having seen the replays was prob the right decision.

He was exceeding atrocious!

But why is the letter of the Laws of the Game applied by referees who appear ever so eager when they are at the Etihad but are strangely reluctant when they're at The Swamp? If Rojo's tackles are not red cards, then by the same token neither was Fernandinho's. We know what the Laws of the Game stipulate and sanction. Why are they not applied by all referees, all of the time?
 
How dare Pep treat the 'journalists' like they are stupid!?

More like how dare the 'journalists' abuse out hospitality and conspire to fabricate nonsense against City with undertones of racism. Which they've been doing since 2008. Honestly at boiling point with them. Fucking hate them all.

true^^^^^^

scholes should have got sent off many a game, instead the bbc always had pundits saying he cant tackle as that`s anything......they defended his actions time and time again. proof of an agenda through the years, when our team lost the value of our teams were mentioned......yet with the scum it never gets highlighted when they are on a run of poor results. i am livid with the BBC.
 
I'm not even sure he was all that bad. Crowd were going to crucify him at any chance after he sent of Fernandinho, which having seen the replays was prob the right decision.

It wasn't even a foul and Mason was particularly poor throughout the rest of the game. If you couldn't see that then you don't know football and you must be one of the 'johnny come lately's' who sit on their hands for 75 mins then make a sharp exit. Furthermore, at certain points during the last 20 mins, Mason looked like he had lost control of the game completely and didn't know what to do. If the FA had any spine they would give him a season in the Championship.
 
Nope not at all. The pundits are at it as well though. A few weeks back Ibrahimovic kicked out at an oppositions players head while they were on the floor and the incident wasn't even mentioned. Had that have been Aguero it would have been a back page and and centre piece double spread in the sports pages of the papers plus unlimited re runs on sky sports news.

Explaining why he meant it and was an evil bastard ;-)
 
I'm amazed the amount of people on here trying to give refs the benefit of the doubt.
I honestly believe, this season, that the rags are being helped all they can to get top 4
and we are seen as the club to drop out. Every man (pundits) and their dog are suddenly predicting it.
 
I'm amazed the amount of people on here trying to give refs the benefit of the doubt.
I honestly believe, this season, that the rags are being helped all they can to get top 4
and we are seen as the club to drop out. Every man (pundits) and their dog are suddenly predicting it.

I defend the refs to the point that the game is so quick nowadays and players are contestant play acting and appealing everything, fans appealing for everything, managers on the touch line going mad - Sorry but that is a very very tough job and to be accused of corruption is unfair. They have an impossible job.

However. Give them some fucking video help and it would make there's lives and the game so much better. What the f*ck is the role of the 4th official ?? They just stand there and take the flack from all the refs decisions. Why can't he just hold a small monitor of the game and when the ref gives a controversial decision he quickly checks his monitor and gives his opinion to the ref - if the ref wants to ignore his opinion then fine. Decision stands. Goal line techonlogy has come into the game and been excellent so why the delay in making the game fairer ?!
 
Just had my attention drawn to this French site - Sofoot.com! Check out the Wiiiiiiist Hiiiiiiim game!

We just don't get that kind of reporting in the RagDipperArseHaringeyMeedya!

Here's a little snippet"

MANCHESTER MARTÈLE WEST HAM
Sans flamboyer, Manchester démarre l'année par une sixième victoire d'affilée en championnat face à West Ham. Un peu grâce aux buts de Mata et Ibra, beaucoup grâce à un De Gea surpuissant, mais surtout grâce à un arbitre proche de la cécité.

Apparently they won with a couple of goals from the Poor Man's Silva and BigNose, some offering from The Alty Shoplifter but 'above all the grace of a near blind referee!'
 
If Rojo's tackles are not red cards, then by the same token neither was Fernandinho's. We know what the Laws of the Game stipulate and sanction. Why are they not applied by all referees, all of the time?

That's a poor argument and if anything says that the ref who didn't send off Rojo is the bad referee. There are decisions every week which some refs would give and others wouldn't. It's always been that way and will be until video technology is used...which I think is unlikely.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top