BlueAnorak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 27,833
Indeed.I agree. Such a pleasure to watch a well refereed game.
Indeed.I agree. Such a pleasure to watch a well refereed game.
was that an agree 'indeed' or a sarcastic 'indeed' I really thought he was good tonight. Let the game flow and was fair to each side.Indeed.
So tell me what you see, count out the number of times they gave actually suffered from such absurdly biased, wrong decisions going against them. I have given you actual, undeniable examples where the refs got it ridiculously "wrong" in their favour.
Woah Cowboy. Seriously I was agreeing with you. I thought he was good tonight. It was actually refreshing to watch a game where the same standard of refereeing was applied to both sides.was that an agree 'indeed' or a sarcastic 'indeed' I really thought he was good tonight. Let the game flow and was fair to each side.
Guess there would be a massive shortage of refs for games if they got red/yellow cards for performance - so many would be suspended at any one time.Think referees should be randomly appointed to games and not picked based perceived ability and difficulty of game. Each team should get within reason an equal distribution of each ref so we can all share the crap refs. Unless a ref is a supporter of a club he should ref the game regardless of where he's from or lives. Then refs should get yellow or red cards based on performance (reviewed by retired refs) and like players they should get bans for incompetence accumulated over period of time.
That's the list I would have as well.Zlatans goal last week, laughable to be disallowed however I did laugh.
Herrera got a second yellow one game for slipping didn't he? That was a poor decision which reduced them to 10 and a key player missed the following game.
Whilst the palace game they had a few things in their favour they also scored a legitamate goal at 1-1 which was ruled out wrongly for offside and had a handball in the build up which could of been a pen.
Zlatan stooded in the knee against West Ham I think it was? Could be wrong but easily could of been a red.
There are others that are a bit more subjective so I wouldn't class then as nailed on one but certainly would do above.
They've had a lot go for them recently which has coincided with their best run of wins for a while, has it been down to Joses bitching about refs, certainly changed the last few weeks. On the whole they've got away with a bit but had some odd ones against them. I certainly wouldn't say they get let off and we get punished I think overall the refs are shockingly bad throughout.
Sorry mate. You can never tell. It was just so different to our games this season. I actually enjoyed it because I never felt he had an agenda or bias. Sad but true. Thought Spuds deserved it and feel they have a really strong first 11-13. Would never swap De Bruyne for Ericsson but would take Deli Ali, their full backs, centre backs and defensive midfield any day of the week. Looking forward to our next home game to see how we measure up.Woah Cowboy. Seriously I was agreeing with you. I thought he was good tonight. It was actually refreshing to watch a game where the same standard of refereeing was applied to both sides.
That's the list I would have as well.
Three, maybe four moderately negative and debatable decisions which is normal for any team.
As against about three games in which they should have been reduced to ten and their key striker should have been missing all of December because of suspensions.
My point is you obviously won't have every single decision go against them but just weigh the pluses and minuses this season, and during most of fergie's period, and it's blatant.