How strange, therefore, you should choose Bob Hope as your BM moniker given that was a raving right wing Republican throughout his life.
; )
He was funny though.
How strange, therefore, you should choose Bob Hope as your BM moniker given that was a raving right wing Republican throughout his life.
; )
He’s actually the owner of the B and B in Emmerdale village.How strange, therefore, you should choose Bob Hope as your BM moniker given that was a raving right wing Republican throughout his life.
; )
Based on reality you say. Incredible.Both points in your question are false.
Starmer is not responsible for bringing people in to the party. Anyone is free to join and free to express a view. Only when things cross a line is there a decision to be made and Starmer tries to keep out of that unlike his predecessor.
And Starmer has never said that starving kids is acceptable.
If you can't keep the discussion based on reality there's no point going on.
Out of curiosity, who do you want as Prime Minister then?Based on reality you say. Incredible.
Well, that's subjective of course.He was funny though.
Nope he did not 100% state that. A journalist asked him if they had the right to do that. There is far more context here and this is the kind of BS that only feeds BS narrative.Tbf I think Hilts has got food and water mixed up, Starmer did 100% state Israel has the Right to withhold Water from the Palestinian people. Either way like me and others have said it's an abhorrent and horrific thing to say. He shouldn't be anywhere near Number 10 on that quote alone.
Well, that's subjective of course.
Catnip for cunts. Surprised you still fall for it.Less a patriot more Putins puppet