Scientific method relies on proof of concept by observation. For anyone to use the argument 'there is no proof a 'higher power' doesn't exist, or to suggest that a 'higher power' is the explanation for things we don't yest understand is bizarre.Do not dare try and suggest what? No matter. Great that you find peace and harmony. What I saying is that you have seemingly decided that your observations about this thread are correct, that my observations are not in agreement and thus are incorrect. How to know what is true? Perhaps you could use a scientific method to go through this thread and draw conclusions that way? Thought not. Anyhow this feels like a distraction from the thread, so maybe best to carry on in pm or to bring the conversation to an end. Cheers
No - YOU go prove it!Because your observations ARE incorrect; making a statement that is completely false and have failed to back it up and are now using your own false interpretations to support your own conclusion.
Here's the "scientific method" for you; use the search function, find all posts on this thread that back up what you claim, copy and paste the specific posts. You're just being ignorant now.
YOU made the claim. There are no posts that state that religion is bad because it is anti-science. You simply can't find any.No - YOU go prove it!
Maybe read it again?Scientific method relies on proof of concept by observation. For anyone to use the argument 'there is no proof a 'higher power' doesn't exist, or to suggest that a 'higher power' is the explanation for things we don't yest understand is bizarre.
Maybe I'm talking about religion in general?Maybe read it again?
I made a comment. Life lives. The earth is still turning. Enjoy.YOU made the claim
And that would be a different conversation to the one that was being had, surely?Maybe I'm talking about religion in general?
An ignorant one, yes.I made a comment. Life lives. The earth is still turning. Enjoy.
According to you, yes.An ignorant one, yes.
I just thought that seeing as someone mentioned scientific method it was a valid point to make as scientific method and religion seem somewhat incompatible.And that would be a different conversation to the one that was being had, surely?