nijinsky's fetlocks
Well-Known Member
The Flash said:nijinsky's fetlocks said:The Flash said:Of course we had immigration before 1997. It just used to be regulated and monitored prior to that.
That's why there are 150,000 failed asylum seekers still in the UK that the authorities can't trace.
Many of which are seeking asylum from oppressive regimes where we have backed puppet dictators,sold arms to both sides,then reduced their countries to rubble.
What goes around...
And so if one of them is driving around in an uninsured car and knocks you down, or if one of them burgles your gaff, you're happy with that are you?
Cos you know, it was your taxes that paid for the British Judicial system to consider their application and turn it down, having had fair hearing in front of a judge?
What goes around....
Of course I fucking wouldn't,but all of the cunts who have ever burgled a property of mine,or run into my car without insurance have all been good old indigenous British scum,not asylum seekers.
But I suppose asylum seekers are all joyriding crackheads in your black and white world.
And yes,I do think that anyone claiming political sylum should be given a full and fair hearing,regardless of whether that causes a backlog of cases or not.
Because that is what civilised,reasonable countries do.
Why you have suddenly mutated into the average Daily Mail reader over this is beyond me,as you are normally one of our better posters.
I shall put it down to a bad day at the office.