Sajid Javid

And the point of a border is to protect the people here and not the people that are coming here.

We should uphold our part in helping refugees but only on the basis that it is orderly, correct and legal. Fishing out migrants in the channel coming from France is none of those.

It's a tried and trusted method NGO's have used in Italy, for some reason governments are reluctant just to tow the ships back to where they came from hence preventing people from expecting to be picked up and brought to Britain in style.
What's worrying is that our own people are homeless but we seem to be finding accommodation for people entering illegally.
 
What's worrying is that our own people are homeless but we seem to be finding accommodation for people entering illegally.

It's not a choice of one or the other though is it.

200 people attempting to cross the channel in 2 months is not a crisis, and the 5th biggest economy in the world should be able to address both it's homelessness problem and process asylum seekers accordingly, regardless of how they arrive.
 
It's a tried and trusted method NGO's have used in Italy, for some reason governments are reluctant just to tow the ships back to where they came from hence preventing people from expecting to be picked up and brought to Britain in style.
What's worrying is that our own people are homeless but we seem to be finding accommodation for people entering illegally.

They put them in detention centres - indefinitely. The only form of UK detention which has no end date. In the year to March 2018 over 26k went through those centres and about 2.5k were still being detained in them. They are run by private companies and have a very poor record on inmate safety and treatment by the centre staff. You could place Britains homeless in there I suppose if that would make you and them happy but I guess the papers and Human Rights organisations would be all over it like flies on shit. Oh and it would draw even more attention to how shit these places are.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...d-brook-house-immigration-centre-claims-abuse

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...tion-public-inquiry-home-office-a8363606.html

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...tion-public-inquiry-home-office-a8363606.html

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...-staff-foreign-national-held-prison-toothache

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...igrant-abuse-claims-detainees-removal-centres
 
If people have family here then why don't they just enter the UK legally then? We have trains, planes or you just drive here and enter via the border like everyone else. There are visas available which enable people to enter the UK completely legally on a family basis.

Just because you are a refugee it does not excuse you to break the law that the rest of us follow, the convention for refugees says refugees must follow the rule of law.

You cannot excuse someone entering the UK illegally because refugee status does not automatically grant you the unlimited freedom of movement anywhere in the world as you please and to exercise that right all you need is a boat....

Have you ever tried getting a visa for the UK ever or recenlty?

I have for imediate family to come over on holiday, and they were refused with a pretty pathetic reason, but then the HO got 300 quid for the visas and as May when as Home Home sec changed the rules so there is right of the right of appeal, another application of the same amount is needed.

It isn't as simple as just applying and getting in, we have no idea if some have tried, been refused but are at their wits end with the situation in france and so chance this crossing anyway.
 
Last edited:
The trouble is your audience isn’t interested in facts that contradict their bigoted imagination.
 
Have you ever tried getting a visa for the UK ever or recenlty?

I have for imediate family to come over on holiday, and tgey were refused with apretty pathetic reason, but then the FO got 300 quid for the visas and as May when as Home Home sec changed thw rules so there is right of the right of appeal, another application of the same amount is needed.

It isn't as simple as just applying and getting in, we hace no idea if some have tried, been refused but are at their wits end with the situation in france and so chance this crossing anyway.

Eligibility is a completely different thing though, all that matters here is following legal process. Your family did but that doesn't mean because they were rejected they can just decide to come anyway does it?

I can't afford a Ferrari so would you allow me to just rob one instead?

Attempting to enter the UK other than through a recognised border is illegal even for eligible EU citizens because the UK is not a Schengen country. Even I as a UK citizen cannot enter the UK from outside of the UK legally without showing my passport or ID.

We have laws and rules for a reason and if the law is not applied to everyone then we may as well not have them and we will just be encouraging people to take the kind of stupid risks we have seen.
 
Attempting to enter the UK other than through a recognised border is illegal even for eligible EU citizens because the UK is not a Schengen country. Even I as a UK citizen cannot enter the UK from outside of the UK legally without showing my passport or ID.
*leaves house, drives for 5 and a half hours, enters UK without being required to show passport or ID*
 
*leaves house, drives for 5 and a half hours, enters UK without being required to show passport or ID*

I was in the Jersey and went to france, and never shown a passport as I entered the EU from a non EU country, should I turn myself in as having illegaly crossed a border?
And then returned not showing a passport.

In fact when I returned to the UK from Jersey I never showed my passport, just went through a different lane.
 
The trouble is your audience isn’t interested in facts that contradict their bigoted imagination.
What is bigoted about border controls? If these people know that this country will allow anyone, from anywhere, to turn up illegally, then the numbers would be astronomical.
They are economic migrants, anyone fleeing persecution would claim asylum in the next safe country, not travel through dozens to get here.
Economic migrants are welcome to apply, through the correct channels.
 
What is bigoted about border controls? If these people know that this country will allow anyone, from anywhere, to turn up illegally, then the numbers would be astronomical.
They are economic migrants, anyone fleeing persecution would claim asylum in the next safe country, not travel through dozens to get here.
Economic migrants are welcome to apply, through the English Channel.

Edited for you
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.