It’s the British mentality. Britain as a nation is very proud of their traditions and heritage. Since the football has been invented by you there was always a consensus among British that football should be played the British way because it’s the only proper way. Strength, power and pace are the common traits that British always consider as a core of how to play football. That’s why for old coaches, the media and most of the fans it’s really hard to alter their thinking towards how the football should be played. This especially goes to so called dinosaurs of football (i.e. Allardyce, Hodgson, Warnock, etc.). They started their coaching careers in the era where muddy pitches, oversized kits, long balls and nasty tackles were something to be admired. That’s how their footballing attitude has shaped.
I read a book written by Jonathan Wilson: “Inverting the pyramid – the history of football tactics”. It clearly outlines how much British football was reluctant to change even though the whole Europe was playing football in a modern way. They valued the British style of play so much that changing it would mean losing your true identity. That’s what in my eyes is still present. British football doesn’t want to lose its identity at least on an international scale.
It’s like telling Brazilians to cut out every street football element from their game and play a rigid 4-4-2 with no room for self-expression. You can clearly see that this English mentality is still present when you look at the young players produced by academies. Only a few “Spanish type” attacking or central midfielders break through into the first team from time to time. Majority of the players are still coached using the old methods to produce a stereotypical English player – physically strong, powerful with good pace, average on the ball. But what all these players are missing is that Spanish element – fantastic vision to pick out a pass, being able to execute different types of passes, being incredibly good on the ball, etc. Of course, there is a genetic element in this but I deeply believe that if young English players were coached right, you would see a lot more of the likes of Phil Foden or young Wilshere. Is it a coincidence that the most “Spanish like” players in Foden and Wilshere came from Arsenal’s and City’s academies? It’s not a coincidence at all. Those two are the prime examples of how these academies develop their young prospects. In my opinion, central midfield is an area on the pitch which epitomises the brand of football a team plays. 9 out of 10 young English players who come through the ranks are pacey wingers or full-backs. These are positions that rely on old, stereotypical English values – pace and power. The only way for England to get better is to retransform all academies (apart from City and Arsenal), introduce modern coaching philosophy at a grass-roots level, teach young coaches in a modern way and wait until all those old-school dinosaurs end their coaching careers.