ayrshire_blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 May 2008
- Messages
- 6,106
[/s]
You make a very fair point there Chris, however there'd be a few parties at the centre or centre left to choose from. If there was ever a Tory type of party they'd have to be so different from the current one to stand a single chance of being elected.
And, if by chance, they were elected...it would bebecause Scottish people have voted them in and not because people from the south of England did. Why would Scotland, or anyone for that matter, wish to stay governed by a parliament which the country has almost unanimously rejected when there's an opportunity like this available?
Chris in London said:ayrshire_blue said:I think a high percentage of those who plan to vote yes are doing so on the basis that no matter how difficult it may be, it will be a Scottish Government making decisions for Scottish people, and never need to worry about Tories being in charge of the country ever again. It's a chance to break free and don't tell me that if the people of Manchester had the same opportunitythey wouldn't seriously consider it.
.
There isn't really any substance in this is there? It's the exact opposite of the Tories' suggestion that without Scottish labour seats the Tories in England would be undefeatable, and it's just as untenable.
If Scottish MPs were no longer elected to Westminster there would inevitably be a fairly major realignment of centre-left politics to avoid political annihilation, and if Scotland became independent there would be a realignment of centre-right politics in Scotland for the very same reason. There would have to be. That centre-right grouping would become the natural party of opposition and when, as sure enough would happen, the Scottish electorate got fed up with the government of the day, the centre right - the tories by another name - would be elected.
You make a very fair point there Chris, however there'd be a few parties at the centre or centre left to choose from. If there was ever a Tory type of party they'd have to be so different from the current one to stand a single chance of being elected.
And, if by chance, they were elected...it would bebecause Scottish people have voted them in and not because people from the south of England did. Why would Scotland, or anyone for that matter, wish to stay governed by a parliament which the country has almost unanimously rejected when there's an opportunity like this available?