Scott Sinclair

[mancityscot]

i'd rather have scott sinclair than adam johnson and that says a lot about AJ. playing with him is like playin 10 players

 

[Damanino]

Hoilett was free, and isnt any worse thean Sinclair.

Ahh Marwood...

 

[Mayor West]

I'd pleased with this signing. He is never going to be world class, but would be an excellent squad player.

 

[MCFC4EVR]

Hoilett was free, and isnt any worse thean Sinclair.

Ahh Marwood...

Actually because he was trained by Blackburn any team in the Premiership have to negotiate a fee with Blackburn or it goes to a Tribunal like Sturridge with us. Blackburn are asking for 6m from QPR they refused so it will be decided by a tribunal add the signing on fee as well it's not as cheap as it sounds.

 

[FantasyIreland]

Hoilett was free, and isnt any worse thean Sinclair.

Ahh Marwood...

Actually because he was trained by Blackburn any team in the Premiership have to negotiate a fee with Blackburn or it goes to a Tribunal like Sturridge with us. Blackburn are asking for 6m from QPR they refused so it will be decided by a tribunal add the signing on fee as well it's not as cheap as it sounds.

4.5m i believe is agreed?

 

[jlc09]

He takes pens at Swansea too, a goal is a goal but it's worth noting when you consider he wont be taking them at a bigger club. 5 or 6 of his 8 league goals must have been pens.

Think he's a bit average myself. Inconsistent.

 

[Seosa]

Better than Johnson and would give us a pacey wing option as a squad player. I'd take a punt if I were Mancini, £4-5m is about right.

 

[BillyShears]

No thanks. Don't really rate Sinclair at all, and for the kind of money that Swansea will ask for, he certainly isn't worth it. Not that I believe the story itself. Just another random farcical link to fill column inches.

 

[Rammyblues]

Personally why do we need him if we are going to persist with 3 -5-2. Doesn't make sense. No squad place available in CL squad but could play in prem league I suppose.

 

[Motty]

At £5m I'd be prepared to give him a chance, he does have some of the makings of what we want although there are some qualities in which he lacks.

Don't think he'd be up to it though. He'd have the odd moment of quality here and there but I think he'd struggle to make an impact and end up going missing in the big games and in the end he'd end up facing similar negativity to what Johnson gets. Of the two of them I'd rather keep AJ.

 

[Ntini77]

I'd prefer Nathan Dyer.

 

[sincity]

Personally why do we need him if we are going to persist with 3 -5-2. Doesn't make sense. No squad place available in CL squad but could play in prem league I suppose.

Surely, it's not going to be the only formation we will using for the coming season. we would be switching formations depending on the team we would be up against..

 

[poyntonblueboy]

very average, no thanks.

 

[ifiwasarichfan]

Nowhere near good enough.

 

[onceabluealways]

Sorry this guy looks ok but if we wanted a player like hazzard who can play number 10 / midfield then why have we not gone for Carzola from Malaga.

 

[FantasyIreland]

Sorry this guy looks ok but if we wanted a player like hazzard who can play number 10 / midfield then why have we not gone for Carzola from Malaga.

He hasn't yet signed for Arsenal has he?

 

[Dax777]

I'd prefer Nathan Dyer.

Me too. He embodies more of that unique, speed quality we are seeking.

 

[Lomas has a lob on]

He would be good back up I suppose, and probably a good sub to have when trying to see a game out, with his pace etc. But didn't he leave Chelsea, due to him not getting enough playing time? Coming to us, would put him back in that situation surely!

 

[Dobsy]

Would much prefer Moses personally. I believe that Hoilett moved to QPR because he was concerned about first team time. Would have loved to have got him. Personally I think he's the best of the three: for me, he's the only one who's demonstrated that he can deliver the 'end product'.

 

[Bill]

Nowhere near our level. Much rather have Johnson .