Scottish independence

Fowlers Penalty Miss said:
Malty said:
Let them go, they will soon come running back.

They need us than we need them.

Once they are gone, there is no coming back.

They make their bed, they can lie in it.

They may vote No of course, but as you say, they need us more than we need them.

The truth is both countries really are "better together". Administering a small but split island would be highly costly
compared to what we have now especially in terms of defence spending. Imo Scotland would be hit worse but
rUK wouldn't do well out of the breakup. The countries united in 1707 because it was in both their best interests.
It still is.
 
Wilf Wild 1937 said:
Fowlers Penalty Miss said:
Malty said:
Let them go, they will soon come running back.

They need us than we need them.

Once they are gone, there is no coming back.

They make their bed, they can lie in it.

They may vote No of course, but as you say, they need us more than we need them.

The truth is both countries really are "better together". Administering a small but split island would be highly costly
compared to what we have now especially in terms of defence spending. Imo Scotland would be hit worse but
rUK wouldn't do well out of the breakup. The countries united in 1707 because it was in both their best interests.
It still is.

United we stand, divided we fall.

I agree with you, but I'm glad I'm not having to make the decision to vote.

Too much brain ache and too much bollocks from both sides.
 
Wilf Wild 1937 said:
Fowlers Penalty Miss said:
Malty said:
Let them go, they will soon come running back.

They need us than we need them.

Once they are gone, there is no coming back.

They make their bed, they can lie in it.

They may vote No of course, but as you say, they need us more than we need them.

The truth is both countries really are "better together". Administering a small but split island would be highly costly
compared to what we have now especially in terms of defence spending. Imo Scotland would be hit worse but
rUK wouldn't do well out of the breakup. The countries united in 1707 because it was in both their best interests.
It still is.

I agree. It's worked pretty well for over 300 years and I don't see any need to change things now. This isn't the same as giving Hong Kong back to the Chinese or Ireland getting independence. Despite all the banter, England and Scotland have been allies for over 3 centuries and the alliance has been a largely successful one.
 
Going to be a lot of very annoyed people once a NO vote is passed.
Will be interesting how the aftermath pans out and all the bitterness comes to the fore.
One things for certain, Scotland will be a very different place going forward.
 
BlueBearBoots said:
Will be interesting to see how right/wrong the polls have been leading up to this, virtually 50/50 yesterday

There's a greater margin for error than usual because its new territory for the pollsters. Hence they could be consistently skewed one way or the other. Although the polls all seem to be coming up with the same result. Could depend on how good the campaigns are at getting out the vote.
 
M18CTID said:
Wilf Wild 1937 said:
Fowlers Penalty Miss said:
Once they are gone, there is no coming back.

They make their bed, they can lie in it.

They may vote No of course, but as you say, they need us more than we need them.

The truth is both countries really are "better together". Administering a small but split island would be highly costly
compared to what we have now especially in terms of defence spending. Imo Scotland would be hit worse but
rUK wouldn't do well out of the breakup. The countries united in 1707 because it was in both their best interests.
It still is.

I agree. It's worked pretty well for over 300 years and I don't see any need to change things now. This isn't the same as giving Hong Kong back to the Chinese or Ireland getting independence. Despite all the banter, England and Scotland have been allies for over 3 centuries and the alliance has been a largely successful one.


Worked well for who though? Not the Scots and thats the problem from their perspective couple of examples

8.9% of the UK population paying 9.9% of the UK tax take
uk government wants to spend £52 billion on a high speed train link whereas there are still a large number of train lines in Scotland running on diesel
A UK Government (Not voted for by Scotland) introduced University fees which Scotland managed to resist for their own population.
UK government wants to renew Trident missile which will cost between £15 and £20 billion. The scots don't even want it and want the subs removing from their country.........

Good luck to the Scots today 'cos whatever way the vote turns out it looks as though they will be independent soon enough
 
I've got family in Scotland (sister's English, kids are all born and bred Scots), but like me they think Salmond wants to go close and be a hero, but he would privately be a very worried man if he had to back up his promises.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.