MCFCTrick
Well-Known Member
Those voting 'Yes' ..... just remember .... the Yanks no you have oil .... and once you aren't part of our 'pact' .... ;-)
Erm, sixteen year olds can marry in England and Wales as well, so what's your point?Gabriel said:ell said:Cant agree with giving 16year olds the vote at all, I know when I was that age me and my mates were definitely not in the position to make such an important decision.
A masterstroke by Salmond
Sorry, but you need to understand that Scotland is a very, very different country. Two sixteen-year olds can legally marry in Scotland, so it makes no sense at all that they cannot vote.
He may be referring to the fact that between the ages of 16-18 in Scotland you don't need parental consent to marry whereas in England and Wales you do.Mëtal Bikër said:Erm, sixteen year olds can marry in England and Wales as well, so what's your point?Gabriel said:ell said:Cant agree with giving 16year olds the vote at all, I know when I was that age me and my mates were definitely not in the position to make such an important decision.
A masterstroke by Salmond
Sorry, but you need to understand that Scotland is a very, very different country. Two sixteen-year olds can legally marry in Scotland, so it makes no sense at all that they cannot vote.
And that's enough of a justification to allow 16 year olds to determine the fate of future generations of an entire nation?Len Rum said:He may be referring to the fact that between the ages of 16-18 in Scotland you don't need parental consent to marry whereas in England and Wales you do.Mëtal Bikër said:Erm, sixteen year olds can marry in England and Wales as well, so what's your point?Gabriel said:Sorry, but you need to understand that Scotland is a very, very different country. Two sixteen-year olds can legally marry in Scotland, so it makes no sense at all that they cannot vote.
Even so, it hardly marks Scotland out as a "very, very different country".Len Rum said:He may be referring to the fact that between the ages of 16-18 in Scotland you don't need parental consent to marry whereas in England and Wales you do.Mëtal Bikër said:Erm, sixteen year olds can marry in England and Wales as well, so what's your point?Gabriel said:Sorry, but you need to understand that Scotland is a very, very different country. Two sixteen-year olds can legally marry in Scotland, so it makes no sense at all that they cannot vote.
It's a good club.smudgedj said:malg said:Jesus Christ.Malty said:Let them go, they will soon come running back.
They need us than we need them.
You'll be able to join the expat club.
Ahh so you can only be a Tory voter to be against the break up of the Union.bellbuzzer said:the anti-Scottish tone of the posters on BM who insist that a yes vote will mean disaster for Scotland and England is puzzling. The mention of the Labour party taking a big hit is greeted with a resounding meh, yet it is the only certain outcome of a yes vote, so unless the tory supporters are acting in a very noble manner and putting self-interest behind a genuine concern for the people of Scotland ( ha ha) , what is their real beef? There isn't a tory party in Scotland ffs. If Scotland is a burden, as is claimed, then getting rid must be a ''good thing'' right. Weakening Labour
must be a good thing, right? What is so fearsome that Cameron ''pleads'' for a no vote, promises to make up for
the years of neglect, extra powers for Scottish Parliament and all manner of bribes. It may be ego-driven or fear of the old tin tack in his case, but that certainly does not apply to the rank and file on BM.
What is the real reason that so provokes tory supporters to such apoplectic rage? And why is it not their battle-cry, instead of meaningless shite like ''Better together''
bellbuzzer said:the anti-Scottish tone of the posters on BM who insist that a yes vote will mean disaster for Scotland and England is puzzling. The mention of the Labour party taking a big hit is greeted with a resounding meh, yet it is the only certain outcome of a yes vote, so unless the tory supporters are acting in a very noble manner and putting self-interest behind a genuine concern for the people of Scotland ( ha ha) , what is their real beef? There isn't a tory party in Scotland ffs. If Scotland is a burden, as is claimed, then getting rid must be a ''good thing'' right. Weakening Labour
must be a good thing, right? What is so fearsome that Cameron ''pleads'' for a no vote, promises to make up for
the years of neglect, extra powers for Scottish Parliament and all manner of bribes. It may be ego-driven or fear of the old tin tack in his case, but that certainly does not apply to the rank and file on BM.
What is the real reason that so provokes tory supporters to such apoplectic rage? And why is it not their battle-cry, instead of meaningless shite like ''Better together''
Shands said:Just been to cast my vote. Never been to a polling day with so much activity and buzz around it, it's interesting I'll give it that.
Mike N said:Shands said:Just been to cast my vote. Never been to a polling day with so much activity and buzz around it, it's interesting I'll give it that.
Which way did you vote mate?
Matty said:Mike N said:Shands said:Just been to cast my vote. Never been to a polling day with so much activity and buzz around it, it's interesting I'll give it that.
Which way did you vote mate?
The normal way I'd guess, put a cross in the relevant section on a piece of paper, then posted it into a ballot box.
Mike N said:Shands said:Just been to cast my vote. Never been to a polling day with so much activity and buzz around it, it's interesting I'll give it that.
Which way did you vote mate?
I'm sure a lot of Tories want a "Yes" vote for the reasons you mention, although those in prominent positions dare not voice it.bellbuzzer said:the anti-Scottish tone of the posters on BM who insist that a yes vote will mean disaster for Scotland and England is puzzling. The mention of the Labour party taking a big hit is greeted with a resounding meh, yet it is the only certain outcome of a yes vote, so unless the tory supporters are acting in a very noble manner and putting self-interest behind a genuine concern for the people of Scotland ( ha ha) , what is their real beef? There isn't a tory party in Scotland ffs. If Scotland is a burden, as is claimed, then getting rid must be a ''good thing'' right. Weakening Labour
must be a good thing, right? What is so fearsome that Cameron ''pleads'' for a no vote, promises to make up for
the years of neglect, extra powers for Scottish Parliament and all manner of bribes. It may be ego-driven or fear of the old tin tack in his case, but that certainly does not apply to the rank and file on BM.
What is the real reason that so provokes tory supporters to such apoplectic rage? And why is it not their battle-cry, instead of meaningless shite like ''Better together''
willy eckerslike said:Questy said:blueinsa said:Spot on.
Will be glad to see the back of 16 and 17 year olds waving a saltire emblazoned with yes shouting how the Tories have ruined their lives for the past 8 years.
I'm no Tory but Salmond has appealed to a vote that doesn't have a clue politically and are wanting to be seen as patriotic.
Sad because the fall out up here will not be nice imo.
100% Agree. I have Nieces and Nephews who would not know the 1st thing about politics and yet are backing the Yes campaign, taken in with all the bravado and no matter what others may say it has, IMO, become a Scotland v England and Tories rally. It has become very very vitriolic and I can see many a broken home when tomorrow comes, please let sense prevail and bring the majority with NO.
]Don't you feel the SNP have tried to paint a picture of Scotland being a nation of down-trodden clansmen being run roughshod by the English nobility (ie the Tories)? I have half-expected Salmond to turn up with half his face painted saltire blue .