jimmy blue shoes
Well-Known Member
How long before they do it all over again?
jimmy blue shoes said:How long before they do it all over again?
Len Rum said:Cameron 'taken a gamble and won'?
More like 'was given a winning hand and nearly blew it'.
Len Rum said:True, it was his 'Aguero 93:20 moment'.gordondaviesmoustache said:Maybe so, but when you're cashing your chips in at the end of the night, the money in your hand smells and feels the same, mate, if you've won.Len Rum said:Cameron 'taken a gamble and won'?
More like 'was given a winning hand and nearly blew it'.
the god Gerry Gow said:Think this is the worst possible result.
Nearly half the Scots now hate the other half
Half the Scots don't want Westminster rule
As usual the English will get shafted
Don't think there is an answer to the West Lothian question.
For example on say the budget. The chancellor introduces a measure for England and Wales only. Then a measure for England Wales and Scitland then a different measure for Scotland only. How exactly will the vote on the budget work. Will MPs vote on seperate elements or will there be seperate budgets.
Spread this across all departments and it's a minefield
tolmie said:Flower of Scotland no more how can we sing that, as for Scotland the Brave, Scotland the Shitebag now!!
Len Rum said:Cameron 'taken a gamble and won'?gordondaviesmoustache said:You make some good points, especially about changing comparisons with the Republic, but I disagree with your last point. I think Cameron had little choice in setting the bar at 50%. A 55% yes vote in a 60% super majority would have been a truly awful and divisive outcome.mad4city said:Sorry, my mistake.
And you're right about the result being what Scotland wanted and no more.
Personally, I think had this vote been taken ten or fifteen years ago, when the economy was booming and the Yes Campaign could've urged the electorate to look at how there'd never be a poor day in post-independence Ireland again, they'd have won by a landslide.
In a close run thing, especially during economically straitened times, people may say one thing but in the privacy of the ballot box their wallets speak louder than their idealism. That ultimately was the tipping point for me.
On a side note, how stupid was Cameron not to demand that any Yes vote would need to be carried by a super majority (say 60%, at least)? He's a lucky boy to still be in a job this morning. Imagine the fall out had either side won by one percent.
He's taken a gamble and won, although not as big a gamble as some thought. I've previously posted on this thread on the power of the privacy of the ballot box. I always expected the power of conservatism to win the day in the end. In stable, western countries change is often viewed with some suspicion.
More like 'was given a winning hand and nearly blew it'.
Lancet Fluke said:Len Rum said:Cameron 'taken a gamble and won'?gordondaviesmoustache said:You make some good points, especially about changing comparisons with the Republic, but I disagree with your last point. I think Cameron had little choice in setting the bar at 50%. A 55% yes vote in a 60% super majority would have been a truly awful and divisive outcome.
He's taken a gamble and won, although not as big a gamble as some thought. I've previously posted on this thread on the power of the privacy of the ballot box. I always expected the power of conservatism to win the day in the end. In stable, western countries change is often viewed with some suspicion.
More like 'was given a winning hand and nearly blew it'.
It was a winning hand until that drippy c**t Darling got involved.
TGR said:Lancet Fluke said:Len Rum said:Cameron 'taken a gamble and won'?
More like 'was given a winning hand and nearly blew it'.
It was a winning hand until that drippy c**t Darling got involved.
Cameron is the man who has just killed off the political career of Alex Salmond.
Salmond is now a busted flush and will be replaced as the leader of the SNP in the not to distant future.
Cameron gave Salmond enough rope and he has hung himself. Nobody on here would have even remotely considered
the margin of the 'No' vote last night. Cameron has now killed off the independence cause for good.
He will also now use the opportunity to beat the drum for 'England' which is a political vote winner for the tories and will also help to head of UKIP.
I would suggest Cameron is feeling pretty pleased with himself this morning whilst Salmond is considering his political future.
Cameron is also being lauded across Europe for allowing the referendum to take place whilst in Spain where they have similar issues
they will not allow it.
All in all - Well done Dave!
TGR said:Lancet Fluke said:Len Rum said:Cameron 'taken a gamble and won'?
More like 'was given a winning hand and nearly blew it'.
It was a winning hand until that drippy c**t Darling got involved.
Cameron is the man who has just killed off the political career of Alex Salmond.
Salmond is now a busted flush and will be replaced as the leader of the SNP in the not to distant future.
Cameron gave Salmond enough rope and he has hung himself. Nobody on here would have even remotely considered
the margin of the 'No' vote last night. Cameron has now killed off the independence cause for good.
He will also now use the opportunity to beat the drum for 'England' which is a political vote winner for the tories and will also help to head of UKIP.
I would suggest Cameron is feeling pretty pleased with himself this morning whilst Salmond is considering his political future.
Cameron is also being lauded across Europe for allowing the referendum to take place whilst in Spain where they have similar issues
they will not allow it.
All in all - Well done Dave!
That should happen .denislawsbackheel said:Pour encourager les autres Salmond should now be stripped naked, bound to a hurdle upside down, dragged through the four areas that voted yes then transported to London and hanged, drawn and quartered in front of the Palace of Westminster.