No they aren't as you would see by reading this thread.are these people the type to purchase a season ticket just to secure their seat for the bigger games and leave it empty for the remainder ?
No they aren't as you would see by reading this thread.are these people the type to purchase a season ticket just to secure their seat for the bigger games and leave it empty for the remainder ?
I can't get my head around people who buy a season ticket which by definition is supposed to be used to attend a seasons worth of games are angry that they are now being made to attend at least half of them?, are these people the type to purchase a season ticket just to secure their seat for the bigger games and leave it empty for the remainder ?
Those circumstances are surely the exception and not the rule, there are people on here quoting that they only do 10 games a year as travel ect make it difficult, so they only ever do 10 games a season let's take a guess which games? What the hell are they buying a season ticket for if its not just to secure the more fashionable fixtures?I know somebody that's a season ticket holder and when I told him about these new requirements last night he's consequently considering jacking it in. Been going years and in the space of a few days his mother was hospitalised with a stroke and his cousin passed away. Yes, I'm sure the club would not take his season ticket off him if he told them, but I don't think he should have to justify why he's not up to going to fixtures at the moment. He's getting on a bit and isn't tech savvy. I've obviously offered to help him, but he probably doesn't want to feel like a burden. Shouldn't be coming to this.
Those circumstances are surely the exception and not the rule, there are people on here quoting that they only do 10 games a year as travel ect make it difficult, so they only ever do 10 games a season let's take a guess which games? What the hell are they buying a season ticket for if its not just to secure the more fashionable fixtures?
So if they only do 10 games then they'll meet the criteria & its just not securing the fashionable games when City are charging £71 for Villa & similar prices for Leicester & WolvesThose circumstances are surely the exception and not the rule, there are people on here quoting that they only do 10 games a year as travel ect make it difficult, so they only ever do 10 games a season let's take a guess which games? What the hell are they buying a season ticket for if its not just to secure the more fashionable fixtures?
I can't get my head around people who buy a season ticket which by definition is supposed to be used to attend a seasons worth of games are angry that they are now being made to attend at least half of them?, are these people the type to purchase a season ticket just to secure their seat for the bigger games and leave it empty for the remainder ?
Those circumstances are surely the exception and not the rule, there are people on here quoting that they only do 10 games a year as travel ect make it difficult, so they only ever do 10 games a season let's take a guess which games? What the hell are they buying a season ticket for if its not just to secure the more fashionable fixtures?
My vague hope this is a signal that they're doing cheapish season cards up there but are trying to signal they don't want them being bought and then sold. I assume it is something City Matters have been asking for - a home end atmosphere end not full of tourists - and this is a clunkyish way of trying to do that. Let's see, I suppose.The test on seasoncards will be in the ticketing of the new stand. If we do a Liverpool and only issue 1,000 season tickets, then it will become clear that the club is squeezing seasoncards.
One of the very rare things that I’m sure we can all agree on, is the concept of buying a season ticket has shifted beyond recognition since the idea was first introduced.
Back when most of us started going, buying a ST had minimal financial saving and wasn’t really any more convenient than paying at the gate.
The benefit was nearly all in the clubs favour. You paid your money upfront in full and the club couldn’t care in the slightest if you turned up once or 21 times in a season.
Times have changed. And I don’t think it’s unreasonable that the club’s attitude changes to reflect that. What we will disagree about, is to what degree that change is fair and acceptable.
You can now buy a season ticket with interest free monthly instalments throughout the season and attend as few as about seven games and still be better off than buying individual tickets for those games.
There’s plenty of ST holders just on this thread that happily admit that they’ve no intention of attending over half the games.
I appreciate that plenty will disagree and that’s fair enough. But for me, as long as the club continue to be sympathetic to special individual circumstances, I don’t have an issue with them not allowing season tickets to be sold to people who routinely have no intention of attending over half of the games.
Maybe to get to the games they can get to regardless of who it's against.Those circumstances are surely the exception and not the rule, there are people on here quoting that they only do 10 games a year as travel ect make it difficult, so they only ever do 10 games a season let's take a guess which games? What the hell are they buying a season ticket for if its not just to secure the more fashionable fixtures?
Great post StephenOne of the very rare things that I’m sure we can all agree on, is the concept of buying a season ticket has shifted beyond recognition since the idea was first introduced.
Back when most of us started going, buying a ST had minimal financial saving and wasn’t really any more convenient than paying at the gate.
The benefit was nearly all in the clubs favour. You paid your money upfront in full and the club couldn’t care in the slightest if you turned up once or 21 times in a season.
Times have changed. And I don’t think it’s unreasonable that the club’s attitude changes to reflect that. What we will disagree about, is to what degree that change is fair and acceptable.
You can now buy a season ticket with interest free monthly instalments throughout the season and attend as few as about seven games and still be better off than buying individual tickets for those games.
There’s plenty of ST holders just on this thread that happily admit that they’ve no intention of attending over half the games.
I appreciate that plenty will disagree and that’s fair enough. But for me, as long as the club continue to be sympathetic to special individual circumstances, I don’t have an issue with them not allowing season tickets to be sold to people who routinely have no intention of attending over half of the games.
No there aren’t.One of the very rare things that I’m sure we can all agree on, is the concept of buying a season ticket has shifted beyond recognition since the idea was first introduced.
Back when most of us started going, buying a ST had minimal financial saving and wasn’t really any more convenient than paying at the gate.
The benefit was nearly all in the clubs favour. You paid your money upfront in full and the club couldn’t care in the slightest if you turned up once or 21 times in a season.
Times have changed. And I don’t think it’s unreasonable that the club’s attitude changes to reflect that. What we will disagree about, is to what degree that change is fair and acceptable.
You can now buy a season ticket with interest free monthly instalments throughout the season and attend as few as about seven games and still be better off than buying individual tickets for those games.
There’s plenty of ST holders just on this thread that happily admit that they’ve no intention of attending over half the games.
I appreciate that plenty will disagree and that’s fair enough. But for me, as long as the club continue to be sympathetic to special individual circumstances, I don’t have an issue with them not allowing season tickets to be sold to people who routinely have no intention of attending over half of the games.
I find it strange that people wouldn’t put their seat on the ticket exchange or transfer it to another City fan if they couldn’t use it. But there are all kinds of reasons why people can’t make it to games and taking season tickets away from them will do nothing at all to help fellow supportersI can't get my head around people who buy a season ticket which by definition is supposed to be used to attend a seasons worth of games are angry that they are now being made to attend at least half of them?, are these people the type to purchase a season ticket just to secure their seat for the bigger games and leave it empty for the remainder ?
Exactly the situation I’m in. 15 years a season ticket holder barely missed a game but because I’ve decided to travel for a year I am now going to be punished and lose my seat. How people defend the club is beyond me.Move house, go to uni, go travelling, start a family or become ill/injured then it's goodbye to your season ticket. Absolutely disgraceful what we've become. Yet still we'll get people defending this.
Very fair points you’ve made but my issue is City aren’t exactly making those tickets affordable for the rest. The single match day prices now are just a joke. They don’t care who sits in the seat as long as it’s sold. The club need to be very careful with how they treat us. Nothing lasts forever they are cashing in on the unbelievable success. I think they’re in for a shock when Pep goes.One of the very rare things that I’m sure we can all agree on, is the concept of buying a season ticket has shifted beyond recognition since the idea was first introduced.
Back when most of us started going, buying a ST had minimal financial saving and wasn’t really any more convenient than paying at the gate.
The benefit was nearly all in the clubs favour. You paid your money upfront in full and the club couldn’t care in the slightest if you turned up once or 21 times in a season.
Times have changed. And I don’t think it’s unreasonable that the club’s attitude changes to reflect that. What we will disagree about, is to what degree that change is fair and acceptable.
You can now buy a season ticket with interest free monthly instalments throughout the season and attend as few as about seven games and still be better off than buying individual tickets for those games.
There’s plenty of ST holders just on this thread that happily admit that they’ve no intention of attending over half the games.
I appreciate that plenty will disagree and that’s fair enough. But for me, as long as the club continue to be sympathetic to special individual circumstances, I don’t have an issue with them not allowing season tickets to be sold to people who routinely have no intention of attending over half of the games.