dw7
Well-Known Member
has he signed yet ?
Actually "myriad" is a plural adverbial.HalfwayUpTheKippax said:zangatangring said:blinkblue said:No, as an interchangeable fluid inside forward, like Balo was at times last season. That's what I think anyway. The way Ronaldo plays sometimes, coming in from the left.
Thanks again for the thought-provoking convictions. However, don't you think that Balotelli would be amazing playing as an "interchangeable fluid inside forward"? The guy has myriads of skill and is, unequivocally, the best candidate for such stipulations in the premier league at the moment.
By definition, myriad doesn't have a plural - you pretentious dick.
VinceYoungisaBLUE said:Soulboy said:VinceYoungisaBLUE said:Not patronize everyone here by using your vocab.
Yeah, don't you just hate those arrogant twats who can spell and use grammar correctly!
Burn them!!!
Not at all, and I think you knew exactly what I meant
zangatangring said:VinceYoungisaBLUE said:Soulboy said:Yeah, don't you just hate those arrogant twats who can spell and use grammar correctly!
Burn them!!!
Not at all, and I think you knew exactly what I meant
I wasn't trying to patronise anyone here at all. can't you see? I've seen some very clever people on this thread and just assumed that such vernacular was typical of analytical intellectuals. Advice would've done; no need for the antipathy.
zangatangring said:HalfwayUpTheKippax said:zangatangring said:Thanks again for the thought-provoking convictions. However, don't you think that Balotelli would be amazing playing as an "interchangeable fluid inside forward"? The guy has myriads of skill and is, unequivocally, the best candidate for such stipulations in the premier league at the moment.
By definition, myriad doesn't have a plural - you pretentious dick.
Ok, sorry, i'll take the higher ground. I assure you i wasn't trying to be pretentious. Just formal. I'm not the one who resorted to insults first.
zangatangring said:blinkblue said:zangatangring said:Thank you. So Aguero would be played as a winger? Wouldn't that be a huge waste?
No, as an interchangeable fluid inside forward, like Balo was at times last season. That's what I think anyway. The way Ronaldo plays sometimes, coming in from the left.
Thanks again for the thought-provoking convictions. However, don't you think that Balotelli would be amazing playing as an "interchangeable fluid inside forward"? The guy has myriads of skill and is, unequivocally, the best candidate for such stipulations in the premier league at the moment.
SilvaLining said:zangatangring said:VinceYoungisaBLUE said:Not at all, and I think you knew exactly what I meant
I wasn't trying to patronise anyone here at all. can't you see? I've seen some very clever people on this thread and just assumed that such vernacular was typical of analytical intellectuals. Advice would've done; no need for the antipathy.
This guy is clearly taking the piss
There are many options based on for Formation and fit. But for starters if we get Aguero (which I highly doubt) he will likely be replacing a departing Tevez.zangatangring said:I must say, all the hype surrounding Sergio Aguero certainly isn't fallacious. I was cynical when it came to his abilities. Now, however, purely based on vicarious judgement, I certainly wouldn't frown upon his purchase, although I have my doubts of the validity of the rumours.
Now, say we did purchase aguero, that would insinuate that a front three of tevez, aguero and balotelli interchanging would be deployed. This obligates Mancini into delegating silva to a playmaker role in the midfield 3. Leaving no room for the purchase of an attacking midfielder.
I would've thought that the acquisition of a more versatile striker/winger such as Hulk would be a more sensible signing, as hulk can pose a greater threat along the final third. If you watch him, you'll see what i mean. Additionally, he can also be utilised as an excellent winger.
Thoughts anyone?