Should Alan Hansen be sacked for racism?

[TCIB]

He should be sacked because he gets 40k a week for talking mostly bollocks. Also his chicken skin neck freaks me out.

p.s. Happy bday Corky :)

 

[SWP's back]

no need to be abusive SWP, im not stuggling with this thread at all , im just curious how you can fight the corner of the BLACK MAN , when a BLACK MAN comes on here and says as a BLACK MAN , hes not offended and thinks its fucking childish and moronic that a BLACK MAN would be offended by being called coloured.

dont start with your " ill talk slowly for you, ill make this clear for you, ill be as simple as i can for you, you dont have the intelligence to understand" abuse. quite frankly it doesnt wash with me.

i grew up in and around a jamaican household, i know what im talking about, and being called coloured in the context of describing a coloured person is not and never will be racist amongst us fucking adults who can actually talk to our coloured freinds without thinking im talking to a coloured freind and watching what i say !!


your on a loser with this buddy i promise you

So no black people find it offensive?

How do you explain those links then?

Promise me all you want, you're wrong. Some people find it offensive or there wouldn't have been all the hulabaloo.

As for your upbringing? So what? I am guessing you are what? 41? I would say society has moved on from any which way you were brought up.

wrong, im sat here with 32 guests because its my birthday tomorrow and marks birthday today, its our annual get together.
ive got 20 odd coloured freinds around me fucking gobsmaked at this entire thread.
my upbringing is still ongoing .

some of these guys want to type and put you right, they are giving it large and laughing their cocks off .

anyway ive got a chilli on and ive got some wide eyed fucktards to feed

lol

you're not listening!!!!

some black people find it offensive. You can tell me about 100 of your black mates not caring and it makes no odds. Some do, so why use it!

Explain the articles I posted if no one is really arsed.

Explain my mates.

It's not a catch all. Ofcourse some aren't arsed. But many are.

ps - happy birthday and you sad **** for being on here when you have 20 mates round.

 

[gaudinho's stolen car]

Oh my God that's the funky shit.

 

[Ancient Citizen]

no need to be abusive SWP, im not stuggling with this thread at all , im just curious how you can fight the corner of the BLACK MAN , when a BLACK MAN comes on here and says as a BLACK MAN , hes not offended and thinks its fucking childish and moronic that a BLACK MAN would be offended by being called coloured.

dont start with your " ill talk slowly for you, ill make this clear for you, ill be as simple as i can for you, you dont have the intelligence to understand" abuse. quite frankly it doesnt wash with me.

i grew up in and around a jamaican household, i know what im talking about, and being called coloured in the context of describing a coloured person is not and never will be racist amongst us fucking adults who can actually talk to our coloured freinds without thinking im talking to a coloured freind and watching what i say !!


your on a loser with this buddy i promise you

So no black people find it offensive?

How do you explain those links then?

Promise me all you want, you're wrong. Some people find it offensive or there wouldn't have been all the hulabaloo.

As for your upbringing? So what? I am guessing you are what? 41? I would say society has moved on from any which way you were brought up.

wrong, im sat here with 32 guests because its my birthday tomorrow and marks birthday today, its our annual get together.
ive got 20 odd coloured freinds around me fucking gobsmaked at this entire thread.
my upbringing is still ongoing .

some of these guys want to type and put you right, they are giving it large and laughing their cocks off .

anyway ive got a chilli on and ive got some wide eyed fucktards to feed

lol

Well personally, this, after all I've read makes the most sense.

 

[i kne albert davy]

Human? no. You are well out.

Apologies accepted in advance.

Do a bit of research old chap one of my pet subjects this is think you'll find they where found in a Sussex Quarry about the time Homo Erectus(a big lad) was evolving into Homo Sapiens(modern man) Humans and what we evolved from have been in Europe for over a million years hence the evolutionary differences in the species,animals and people evolve to suit their environments simples.

Well seeing as erectus did not evolve into homo sapien and that modern human did not evolve until 195,000 years ago IN AFRICA, then you are plainly wrong (as Damocles has already said earlier in the thread).

Unless you can provide me a source that says that HUMANS were around in the UK before 150,000 years.

I'll save you a job, you won't be able to.

here read these:

<a class="postlink" href="http://anthro.palomar.edu/homo2/mod_homo_4.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://anthro.palomar.edu/homo2/mod_homo_4.htm</a>
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.pnas.org/content/63/4/1088.short" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.pnas.org/content/63/4/1088.short</a>
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v4" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v4</a> ... 04072.html
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar</a> ... 9707640968
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.getcited.org/pub/102702173" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.getcited.org/pub/102702173</a>
<a class="postlink" href="http://press.princeton.edu/titles/4621.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://press.princeton.edu/titles/4621.html</a>
<a class="postlink" href="http://dna1.genome.ou.edu/5853/outofafr" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://dna1.genome.ou.edu/5853/outofafr</a> ... re1987.pdf
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v4" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v4</a> ... 05874.html
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info</a> ... io.0040072
<a class="postlink" href="http://hub.hku.hk/handle/10722/81471" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://hub.hku.hk/handle/10722/81471</a>
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info</a> ... io.0050254

So u believe in god then that homo sapiens just arrived on the planet read some more not just what you want Homo Hablis(handy man) ancestor of Homo Erectus, ancestor of Homo sapiens(wise man) though not always. Just put Human Evolution up on Google you'll find plenty to read.

 

[mackenzie]

Some posters are offended by the word **** on here but it doesn't stop some using it.
Some of whom have said that they don't use the word coloured because 'some are offended by it.'
Should Hansen be sacked? No, because for his generation it was not meant as derisory.

 

[SWP's back]

Do a bit of research old chap one of my pet subjects this is think you'll find they where found in a Sussex Quarry about the time Homo Erectus(a big lad) was evolving into Homo Sapiens(modern man) Humans and what we evolved from have been in Europe for over a million years hence the evolutionary differences in the species,animals and people evolve to suit their environments simples.

Well seeing as erectus did not evolve into homo sapien and that modern human did not evolve until 195,000 years ago IN AFRICA, then you are plainly wrong (as Damocles has already said earlier in the thread).

Unless you can provide me a source that says that HUMANS were around in the UK before 150,000 years.

I'll save you a job, you won't be able to.

here read these:

<a class="postlink" href="http://anthro.palomar.edu/homo2/mod_homo_4.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://anthro.palomar.edu/homo2/mod_homo_4.htm</a>
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.pnas.org/content/63/4/1088.short" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.pnas.org/content/63/4/1088.short</a>
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v4" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v4</a> ... 04072.html
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar</a> ... 9707640968
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.getcited.org/pub/102702173" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.getcited.org/pub/102702173</a>
<a class="postlink" href="http://press.princeton.edu/titles/4621.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://press.princeton.edu/titles/4621.html</a>
<a class="postlink" href="http://dna1.genome.ou.edu/5853/outofafr" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://dna1.genome.ou.edu/5853/outofafr</a> ... re1987.pdf
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v4" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v4</a> ... 05874.html
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info</a> ... io.0040072
<a class="postlink" href="http://hub.hku.hk/handle/10722/81471" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://hub.hku.hk/handle/10722/81471</a>
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info</a> ... io.0050254

So u believe in god then that homo sapiens just arrived on the planet read some more not just what you want Homo Hablis(handy man) ancestor of Homo Erectus, ancestor of Homo sapiens(wise man) though not always. Just put Human Evolution up on Google you'll find plenty to read.

What the hell are you on about?

Ofcourse I don't believe in God. Did you read any of those scientific links?

Try this one

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history-archaeology/human-migration.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history-a ... ation.html</a>

Entitled:

"The Great Human Migration
Why humans left their African homeland 80,000 years ago to colonize the world"

Humans were not in the UK 200,000 years ago. They didn't exist. Just you wait until damocles logs on and sees what you have written.

Or this one:

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.onthewing.org/user/Sci_Journey%20of%20Man.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.onthewing.org/user/Sci_Journ ... %20Man.pdf</a>

which starts:

By analyzing DNA from people in all regions of the world, geneticist Spencer Wells has
concluded that all humans alive today are descended from a single man who lived in Africa
around 60,000 years ago. Modern humans, he contends, didn't start their spread across the globe
until after that time. Most archaeologists would say the exodus began 100,000 years ago-a
40,000-year discrepancy. Wells' take on the origins of modern humans and how they came to
populate the rest of the planet is bound to be controversial. His work adds to an already crowded
field of opposing hypotheses proposed by those who seek answers in "stones and bones"-
archaeologists and paleoanthropologists - and those who seek them in our blood-population
geneticists and molecular biologists.

The bones you talk about were not humans, were never human, did not survive to become humans and have nothing to do with humans othert than share a common ancestor with humans. They were "humaniod", nothing more.<br /><br />-- Thu Dec 22, 2011 7:36 pm --<br /><br />

Some posters are offended by the word **** on here but it doesn't stop some using it.
Some of whom have said that they don't use the word coloured because 'some are offended by it.'
Should Hansen be sacked? No, because for his generation it was not meant as derisory.

I agree with that, he was ignorant, not racist nor vindictive. The point is that some people are saying "its pc gone mad" etc etc, which is an argument from ignorance as opposed to a genuine argument.

And when a people are persecuted on grounds of being "cunts" and the like, then your analogy will be valid.

 

[Anonymous]

So, was all this about eugenics then?

 

[oakiecokie]

Perhaps someone should contact the BBC and ask if anyone,just anyone person,has officially complained about the use of the word "coloured" !!!

 

[TCIB]

Perhaps someone should contact the BBC and ask if anyone,just anyone person,has officially complained about the use of the word "coloured" !!!

They must have matey, bbc put a message on twitter they are investigating it.