pauldominic
Well-Known Member
Blue Haze said:
Precisely said ...
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
should city sell de jong?
- Thread starter birchwoodgingerste
- Start date
Precisely said ...
The Fat el Hombre
Well-Known Member
Salar said:dude that is hes job to protect the defendersThe Fat el Hombre said:I thought he was a waste of time again last night. Our attacks were short a man every time because he was stood next to Lescott and Vinnie when most others had moved forward and most of his tackles were slides that gave the ball straight back to them. Playing with de Jong is becoming a handicap.
It isn't enough. He's got to offer more when we've got the ball
That's how I felt about your response. Which clearly was an attempt to change topic. I mean, you challenged my claim that De Jong wasn't necessary, by claiming he is important. I explain to you why I believe what I said was right. You then respond by focusing on the irrelevant: My off hand comment about Yaya, and the spelling of a word. Really?pauldominic said:Dax777 said:Lol!So Yaya is bullying Africa? I doubt it.
Why have you mis-spelt necessary without correcting yourself?
Well thats an intelligent response of course.
A
A
Anonymous
Guest
no
pauldominic
Well-Known Member
Dax777 said:pauldominic said:Dax777 said:Lol!
Well thats an intelligent response of course.
That's how I felt about your response.
Which clearly was an attempt to change topic. I mean, you challenged my claim that De Jong wasn't necessary, by claiming he is important. I explain to you why I believe what I said was right. You then respond by focusing on the irrelevant: My off hand comment about Yaya, and the spelling of a word. Really?
I'll have to decipher this:)
NDJ is important as an important and flexible squad player who is also an international.
City have clearly missed Yaya and Kolo.
Please explain the rest of your argument.
pauldominic
Well-Known Member
The Fat el Hombre said:Salar said:dude that is hes job to protect the defendersThe Fat el Hombre said:I thought he was a waste of time again last night. Our attacks were short a man every time because he was stood next to Lescott and Vinnie when most others had moved forward and most of his tackles were slides that gave the ball straight back to them. Playing with de Jong is becoming a handicap.
It isn't enough. He's got to offer more when we've got the ball
Football is a simple game to me.
NDJ can see when defenders are charging forwards and he wants to cover for them.
If by chance we're losing or drawing any match then he can charge forward, surprise the opposition and score a goal.
Lord Blue
Well-Known Member
No we should keep him.
For me, there are games when we need him and there are games when we absolutely don't need him.
For me, there are games when we need him and there are games when we absolutely don't need him.
WyongBlue
Well-Known Member
Need to keep hold of De Jong as long as possible, because during the match at Porto Nigel played a blinder, he is a good all round player, who has certainly struggled this season, but it looks like he's starting to bounce back to his old self.................
Lord Blue
Well-Known Member
at just the right time tooWyongBlue said:Need to keep hold of De Jong as long as possible, because during the match at Porto Nigel played a blinder, he is a good all round player, who has certainly struggled this season, but it looks like he's starting to bounce back to his old self.................