so this agenda thing.

Status
Not open for further replies.
gordondaviesmoustache said:
Phil Neville is a sinfully dull bore who wouldn't get three minutes of my time if he wanted to engage in conversation with me in my local.

Rio Ferdinand is inarticulate to the point of parody. It is painful to watch the slow death of the English language when he opens his camel-like mouth.

If anyone cannot see that they have both been promoted significantly beyond their broadcasting abilities merely because they played for united then they are completely beyond help.

Yes but it's not proof of an agenda. It happened with ex Liverpool players after they were successful. Now after the rags period of domination it's their turn. Are you telling me in 10 years it impossible that the likes of Hart and Kompany could be anchors on motd?
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
Phil Neville is a sinfully dull bore who wouldn't get three minutes of my time if he wanted to engage in conversation with me in my local.

Rio Ferdinand is inarticulate to the point of parody. It is painful to watch the slow death of the English language when he opens his camel-like mouth.

If anyone cannot see that they have both been promoted significantly beyond their broadcasting abilities merely because they played for united then they are completely beyond help.


But Phil is the brother of the best pundit on tv.
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
Phil Neville is a sinfully dull bore who wouldn't get three minutes of my time if he wanted to engage in conversation with me in my local.

Rio Ferdinand is inarticulate to the point of parody. It is painful to watch the slow death of the English language when he opens his camel-like mouth.

If anyone cannot see that they have both been promoted significantly beyond their broadcasting abilities merely because they played for united then they are completely beyond help.

The BBC received hundreds of complaints about P. Neville's dry World Cup punditry and still they hire him when there are probably much more entertaining ex-footballers out there. An era of biased scousers on BBC is set to be replaced by an era of biased and bitter reds who can barely bring themselves to name our club (in Rio's case at least).

And don't forget Scholes is on BT now too. All that's left is to find Nicky Butt and Chris Casper roles somewhere.
 
johnmc said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
Phil Neville is a sinfully dull bore who wouldn't get three minutes of my time if he wanted to engage in conversation with me in my local.

Rio Ferdinand is inarticulate to the point of parody. It is painful to watch the slow death of the English language when he opens his camel-like mouth.

If anyone cannot see that they have both been promoted significantly beyond their broadcasting abilities merely because they played for united then they are completely beyond help.

Yes but it's not proof of an agenda. It happened with ex Liverpool players after they were successful. Now after the rags period of domination it's their turn. Are you telling me in 10 years it impossible that the likes of Hart and Kompany could be anchors on motd?

In 10 years time, Vincent Kompany will be President of the World.
 
LoveCity said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
Phil Neville is a sinfully dull bore who wouldn't get three minutes of my time if he wanted to engage in conversation with me in my local.

Rio Ferdinand is inarticulate to the point of parody. It is painful to watch the slow death of the English language when he opens his camel-like mouth.

If anyone cannot see that they have both been promoted significantly beyond their broadcasting abilities merely because they played for united then they are completely beyond help.

The BBC received hundreds of complaints about P. Neville's dry World Cup punditry and still they hire him when there are probably much more entertaining ex-footballers out there. An era of biased scousers on BBC is set to be replaced by an era of biased and bitter reds who can barely bring themselves to name our club (in Rio's case at least).

And don't forget Scholes is on BT now too. All that's left is to find Nicky Butt and Chris Casper roles somewhere.

FFS! Why can't you people grasp a simple concept. Phil is the brother of the best pundit on TV.
 
Blue Is the Opposite of Blue said:
kiam06 said:
Phil Neville announced as not being part of United back room next day gets a job as a pundit for the BBC.

Why are there no City pundits yet a shite defender like Phil Neville gets on there?
Because his brother is the best pundit on British TV.

Because he worked for the BBC during the World Cup anyway.

Because the BBC don't make choices based on what you like because they have no idea who you are and never will no matter how much you complain about their relatively safe employment policies.

The BBC had a record number of complaints about how hopeless he was at the World Cup.
 
stony said:
LoveCity said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
Phil Neville is a sinfully dull bore who wouldn't get three minutes of my time if he wanted to engage in conversation with me in my local.

Rio Ferdinand is inarticulate to the point of parody. It is painful to watch the slow death of the English language when he opens his camel-like mouth.

If anyone cannot see that they have both been promoted significantly beyond their broadcasting abilities merely because they played for united then they are completely beyond help.

The BBC received hundreds of complaints about P. Neville's dry World Cup punditry and still they hire him when there are probably much more entertaining ex-footballers out there. An era of biased scousers on BBC is set to be replaced by an era of biased and bitter reds who can barely bring themselves to name our club (in Rio's case at least).

And don't forget Scholes is on BT now too. All that's left is to find Nicky Butt and Chris Casper roles somewhere.

FFS! Why can't you people grasp a simple concept. Phil is the brother of the best pundit on TV.
The BBC to Sky is like Phil to Gary: we'll just get the next best thing.
 
johnmc said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
Phil Neville is a sinfully dull bore who wouldn't get three minutes of my time if he wanted to engage in conversation with me in my local.

Rio Ferdinand is inarticulate to the point of parody. It is painful to watch the slow death of the English language when he opens his camel-like mouth.

If anyone cannot see that they have both been promoted significantly beyond their broadcasting abilities merely because they played for united then they are completely beyond help.

Yes but it's not proof of an agenda. It happened with ex Liverpool players after they were successful. Now after the rags period of domination it's their turn. Are you telling me in 10 years it impossible that the likes of Hart and Kompany could be anchors on motd?
No mate. It's far from impossible and in actual fact, it's highly probable that we'll have a much more prominent presence in the media well before then. Moreover I don't think there's an agenda per se.

However, if we ever have (ex) players as dull or inarticulate as those two, I certainly hope we never hold sufficient power over the media that these characteristics will be ignored and those (ex) players, in spite of their unsuitability for the job, become national TV pundits.

That would annoy me too, although not as much, obviously.
 
TFC said:
johnmc said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
Phil Neville is a sinfully dull bore who wouldn't get three minutes of my time if he wanted to engage in conversation with me in my local.

Rio Ferdinand is inarticulate to the point of parody. It is painful to watch the slow death of the English language when he opens his camel-like mouth.

If anyone cannot see that they have both been promoted significantly beyond their broadcasting abilities merely because they played for united then they are completely beyond help.

Yes but it's not proof of an agenda. It happened with ex Liverpool players after they were successful. Now after the rags period of domination it's their turn. Are you telling me in 10 years it impossible that the likes of Hart and Kompany could be anchors on motd?

In 10 years time, Vincent Kompany will be President of the World.
don't think he'll get Roberto's vote
 
Blue Is the Opposite of Blue said:
stony said:
LoveCity said:
The BBC received hundreds of complaints about P. Neville's dry World Cup punditry and still they hire him when there are probably much more entertaining ex-footballers out there. An era of biased scousers on BBC is set to be replaced by an era of biased and bitter reds who can barely bring themselves to name our club (in Rio's case at least).

And don't forget Scholes is on BT now too. All that's left is to find Nicky Butt and Chris Casper roles somewhere.

FFS! Why can't you people grasp a simple concept. Phil is the brother of the best pundit on TV.
The BBC to Sky is like Phil to Gary: we'll just get the next best thing.
Going off that logic I'd better let City know that Rodrigo Messi is available. He's bound to be the second best in the world if Messi is his brother.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.