Didsbury Dave
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Feb 2007
- Messages
- 38,148
de niro said:Eds said:Let's not have another thread running to 100s of pages about whether or not there is an agenda. An agenda does exist within the media to view certain clubs in a certain light. Our rapid progress over the past five years has upset the apple cart and the media doesn't like it as their cosy relationships are beginning to crumble. I have no doubts in my mind that in the future (although it might not be in my lifetime) the truth about corruption within the English game will come out. Things such as certain transfers for stupid amounts of money, transfers that had everyone asking why did that club sign him, brown envelopes, refs admitting that they turned a blind eye etc etc. At the moment things like missing of the club name seem petty but a lot of small things add up to one big thing. Take it from me our owners won't forget all the small things such as the snide artcicles, agents pouring poison into players ears etc and all things come home to roost eventually. We just have to bide our time, smile at people, nod and agree with them, but all the time knowing they will stick the knife in but when, not if, we dominate football we won't forget who they were. Enjoy the ride, it will be bumpy as we know, but what a ride it has already been and will continue to be.
agree with you but I want to know what the non agendaists think when this happens in the same clip, 3 players 3 clubs one club left out of the caption.
it'll be on a loop so give it a look.
Why don't you explain it, Bill?
Was it an oversight by the office junior who does the captions which you happened to notice because you're a City fan?
Was it a conscious decision which came from the senior people at Sky? If it was then how exactly is the club affected?
It can only be one of these two things.