DTKOAG
Well-Known Member
You can compare Chelsea and Spuds... One is successful and the other one is laughed at..EssexYid said:mancity89 said:Yes I agree 100% because arsenal, united and Liverpool haven’t spent a single penny they've souly relied on their academies.
Also when it comes to spending you boys have been the worse by far, spent shitloads on average players and its never drawn attention because of your love affair with the media
Now jog on
There are some proper fools on here, of course all those clubs and Spurs have spent money but those clubs are run as a business, they are not having hundreds of millions pumped into them by a "sugar daddy" are they ffs, can you not spot the difference.
Spurs for instance generate their own money as A FOOTBALL CLUB, every penny spent by Tottenham comes from our annual turnover, Spurs spent £119.3m on players last season but still made a profit of £33.4m, Chelsea on the other hand are "bankrolled" by Abramovich and make a loss of £80m per year, you cant compare the Two.
Spurs have spent shit loads on "average players" have they, still good enough to beat Manchester City 10 times out of the last 11 meetings, and good enough to beat Chelsea in a Cup Final.
What have Manchester City done since 1976 then apart from being a Yo Yo club, and achieving absolutely nothing, apart from moving into a "council owned" stadium.
Now take your bitterness and jealousy somewhere else.