SSN Right Now - Balo Charged By FA - Now inc Peter Crouch!!

Re: SSN Right Now - Balo Charged By FA

redmizzle said:
scousemanc said:
LedleyKing said:
Finally good to see the FA get one right.

As far as whether or not Webb saw it, you can only go off what he says. He said he didn't see it and that's that. Be pissed if you like, but what more can the FA do? Say, "no Webb, we are going to throw out your statement and conclude that you did see it" and not ban Balotelli as a result? Of course not.

Now, the more important issue, of whether or not he deserves to be banned. Obviously, this revolves around whether or not the stamp was intentional. Despite being a Spurs supporter, this is an issue I like to think I can consider in a completely unbiased way for the simple fact that, regardless of the color of the jerseys, if you had replaced Balotelli with any other player on any other team in the league (same with Parker) I would still be calling for a harsh ban on what was a clearly intentional stamp. It truly amazes me how some can watch all of the angles and conclude that his leg was in the natural motion of reclaiming his balance. I simply do not see it this way. The lad is falling forward, yet his leg extends to the side and back. It was intentional. It was dirty. And there is no place for it at any level, in any league. We could easily be talking this morning about permanent serious damage that Parker received as a result of Balotelli's intentional action.

I said in the pre-match that the last thing I wanted was for a refereeing decisions to decide the match. I wouldn't say that is exactly what happened, but a missed call by Webb has clearly influenced the final result. Perhaps you feel justice was served if you believe City deserved the three points (personally, I think a draw would have better reflected the way the match went) and fair enough. Plenty of decisions have gone against you lot this season. For me, though, it is impossible not be upset at the way things turned out. Players con the referee all the time with dives, etc. But Balotelli did so by violently lashing out at another player. That pill is much harder to swallow.

Anywho. Great second half. We probably should have nipped all 3 points, but I guess to a certain extent we are still the same old Spurs. Either way, certainly the excitement level we all hoped for and an entertaining match until the end.

Hopefully the next time we play the headlines won't be dominated by the unacceptable behavior of a single player, but by the well-played, hard-fought battle between two of the league's top teams.

Huddlestone / Elmander. Say no more.

Spot on! Fucking hypocrite. You've a snide bastard like Huddlestone in your squad and i doubt you were so vocal when he stamped on other players at least twice before yet you come on here trying to preach about Balotelli, cry me a fucking river!!

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010/nov/08/tom-huddlestone-tottenham-fa" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010 ... ttenham-fa</a>

I'm assuming that is the stamp you are referring to?

Yes, I did see it. And yes, I do believe Huddlestone should have been banned. The difference? Referee Foy said he saw the Huddlestone stamp and did not deem it worthy of a card (which, as I said, I believe he is wrong about). Webb did not see the Balotelli stamp.
 
Re: SSN Right Now - Balo Charged By FA

LedleyKing said:
dannybcity said:
LedleyKing said:
Despite being a Spurs supporter, this is an issue I like to think I can consider in a completely unbiased way for the simple fact that, regardless of the color of the jerseys...

Well that's that then, thanks for coming on here and put this debate to bed.

No problem. Always happy to offer up an opinion. I'm glad you think so highly of it. Perhaps we should have a meal together and I can give you my opinion on other things too. That is, if there are any other debates you would like put to bed.


Are you grooming?
 
Re: SSN Right Now - Balo Charged By FA

The FA surely have to prove intent (mens rea) and I would, without hesitation, say that it would be impossible. Only Mario would be able to say what was going through his mind, everything else is conjecture. Unfortunately for us the burden of proof is miniscule for the dictators at the FA. I think we are rapidly getting to the stage where we need a "football spring" if they managed to get rid of Ghaddafi there must be some hope.
 
Re: SSN Right Now - Balo Charged By FA

redmizzle said:
scousemanc said:
LedleyKing said:
Finally good to see the FA get one right.

As far as whether or not Webb saw it, you can only go off what he says. He said he didn't see it and that's that. Be pissed if you like, but what more can the FA do? Say, "no Webb, we are going to throw out your statement and conclude that you did see it" and not ban Balotelli as a result? Of course not.

Now, the more important issue, of whether or not he deserves to be banned. Obviously, this revolves around whether or not the stamp was intentional. Despite being a Spurs supporter, this is an issue I like to think I can consider in a completely unbiased way for the simple fact that, regardless of the color of the jerseys, if you had replaced Balotelli with any other player on any other team in the league (same with Parker) I would still be calling for a harsh ban on what was a clearly intentional stamp. It truly amazes me how some can watch all of the angles and conclude that his leg was in the natural motion of reclaiming his balance. I simply do not see it this way. The lad is falling forward, yet his leg extends to the side and back. It was intentional. It was dirty. And there is no place for it at any level, in any league. We could easily be talking this morning about permanent serious damage that Parker received as a result of Balotelli's intentional action.

I said in the pre-match that the last thing I wanted was for a refereeing decisions to decide the match. I wouldn't say that is exactly what happened, but a missed call by Webb has clearly influenced the final result. Perhaps you feel justice was served if you believe City deserved the three points (personally, I think a draw would have better reflected the way the match went) and fair enough. Plenty of decisions have gone against you lot this season. For me, though, it is impossible not be upset at the way things turned out. Players con the referee all the time with dives, etc. But Balotelli did so by violently lashing out at another player. That pill is much harder to swallow.

Anywho. Great second half. We probably should have nipped all 3 points, but I guess to a certain extent we are still the same old Spurs. Either way, certainly the excitement level we all hoped for and an entertaining match until the end.

Hopefully the next time we play the headlines won't be dominated by the unacceptable behavior of a single player, but by the well-played, hard-fought battle between two of the league's top teams.

Huddlestone / Elmander. Say no more.

Spot on! Fucking hypocrite. You've a snide bastard like Huddlestone in your squad and i doubt you were so vocal when he stamped on other players at least twice before yet you come on here trying to preach about Balotelli, cry me a fucking river!!
And the stamp/assault in the CL last season
 
Re: SSN Right Now - Balo Charged By FA

CityBuzzin said:
SWP's back said:
TCIB said:
Some of these posts are just plain bollocks.

If that was Rooney we would be screaming fucking murder, any user here who genuinly thinks he did not attempt to stamp on Parker needs to finish their homework and go to bed.

Yes i get the "parker should have been of" stuff. The FACT is he was on and Balo did attempt to stamp on him.
Now unless you dispute the law of physics regarding gravity,motion-inertia i can't see how you could do anything but hold your hands up and take it like an adult.

Your argument is complete and utter bollocks...so does your imaginary stamp.


By bollocks do you mean informed fair and unbias ?

I'll assume you a non beleiver in this physics lark then.

You give no reason for your statement (that makes no sense btw) other than you simply disagree.
I can understand you may be rushing your post so as to make your MENSA meeting but please allow me to reply.

So your going to tell me you would take no issue if that was for example your son playing who someone attempted to stamp on right ?.
As you seem to think slamming your foot down with excessive force in totally the opposite direction your instinct would place said foot, should you be falling.

I love city but i keep certain values and ideals i will not comprimise.
Violent acts for no good reason is one of them.
Especially said acts that hurt the club i support and have done faithfully since i was able to comprehend what "supporting" constituted.
 
Re: SSN Right Now - Balo Charged By FA

Meatnspud.mcfc. glad someones talking a bit of sense, if any one had done the same thing to silva, we would have wanted him fucking hung. marios record is a fucking disgrace. .
 
Re: SSN Right Now - Balo Charged By FA

SalfordCityBlue said:
LedleyKing said:
So, by your reading of the video (not saying you are wrong) Modric pushes Balotelli in the back. Fine, fair enough. Forgive me if I'm wrong, but when one is pushed in the back they are typically propelled forward. When one is pushed forward their legs propel forward as well, attempting to "catch" the person and keep them from falling if you will. The legs do not, when one is pushed in the back, extend out behind him/her and make contact with the ground (or in this case a head).

Why doesn't one fuck off to one's own forum?

You lost, we won. Get over it and stop bleating. Your club and its fans have embarrassed themselves today - such bad losers.

We'll move on and win the league, you are irrelevant to us now.

Well said, horrible, whinging, obnoxious, cockney tosspots.
 
Re: SSN Right Now - Balo Charged By FA

redmizzle said:
scousemanc said:
LedleyKing said:
Finally good to see the FA get one right.

As far as whether or not Webb saw it, you can only go off what he says. He said he didn't see it and that's that. Be pissed if you like, but what more can the FA do? Say, "no Webb, we are going to throw out your statement and conclude that you did see it" and not ban Balotelli as a result? Of course not.

Now, the more important issue, of whether or not he deserves to be banned. Obviously, this revolves around whether or not the stamp was intentional. Despite being a Spurs supporter, this is an issue I like to think I can consider in a completely unbiased way for the simple fact that, regardless of the color of the jerseys, if you had replaced Balotelli with any other player on any other team in the league (same with Parker) I would still be calling for a harsh ban on what was a clearly intentional stamp. It truly amazes me how some can watch all of the angles and conclude that his leg was in the natural motion of reclaiming his balance. I simply do not see it this way. The lad is falling forward, yet his leg extends to the side and back. It was intentional. It was dirty. And there is no place for it at any level, in any league. We could easily be talking this morning about permanent serious damage that Parker received as a result of Balotelli's intentional action.

I said in the pre-match that the last thing I wanted was for a refereeing decisions to decide the match. I wouldn't say that is exactly what happened, but a missed call by Webb has clearly influenced the final result. Perhaps you feel justice was served if you believe City deserved the three points (personally, I think a draw would have better reflected the way the match went) and fair enough. Plenty of decisions have gone against you lot this season. For me, though, it is impossible not be upset at the way things turned out. Players con the referee all the time with dives, etc. But Balotelli did so by violently lashing out at another player. That pill is much harder to swallow.

Anywho. Great second half. We probably should have nipped all 3 points, but I guess to a certain extent we are still the same old Spurs. Either way, certainly the excitement level we all hoped for and an entertaining match until the end.

Hopefully the next time we play the headlines won't be dominated by the unacceptable behavior of a single player, but by the well-played, hard-fought battle between two of the league's top teams.

Huddlestone / Elmander. Say no more.

Spot on! Fucking hypocrite. You've a snide bastard like Huddlestone in your squad and i doubt you were so vocal when he stamped on other players at least twice before yet you come on here trying to preach about Balotelli, cry me a fucking river!!
FFS; be realistic. Huddlestone is a Spurs player and, as such, is incapable of doing anything illegal. Consequently, he is beyond reproach and therefore cannot be criticized for anything he may or may not have done.
 
Re: SSN Right Now - Balo Charged By FA

Blue Lloyd said:
Think we need to take this one on the chin Blues. As much as I love Mario he isn't (yet) one of our main stay players. I'd be far more concerned if we'd lost Hart, Aguero, Silver etc than Balo. Kompany again is another so thank Christ he's back after Wednesday.

In my opinion for what it's worth? Losing Mario on a four game ban won't be what wins or costs us the league.

We should appeal so he can play in the CC game. I'd take a 5 game ban (unjustified IMO), 5th game is Bolton home.
 
Re: SSN Right Now - Balo Charged By FA

LedleyKing said:
dannybcity said:
LedleyKing said:
Despite being a Spurs supporter, this is an issue I like to think I can consider in a completely unbiased way for the simple fact that, regardless of the color of the jerseys...

Well that's that then, thanks for coming on here and put this debate to bed.

No problem. Always happy to offer up an opinion. I'm glad you think so highly of it. Perhaps we should have a meal together and I can give you my opinion on other things too. That is, if there are any other debates you would like put to bed.

Are Spurs going to win the league? I don't think they are because they're shite and bottle it everytime they play a decent side but I keep hearing about how good they are? I'm confused!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.