squirtyflower said:
better get more rent boys down the fulham road to pay for it then
No need, we have an oligarch. Not as wealthy as your Sheikh by any means, but still fucking loaded and passionate about the club. Hell, his wealth grew by something like 20% this year after it's decline last year. It's not like he's short of cash. I know for a fact that we are looking at new sites for a ground in the region of 60,000 capacity.
The problem for you guys is you can buy the whole of East Manchester for the cost of a penthouse in Chelsea!
I very much agree with this. My Dad is an architect, and he tells me mock ups have been produced for two areas for a new stadium (as produced by a private firm he has worked with). One of which is on the Earls Court/Olympia site, which is about one and a bit miles from the current site, the other is Battersea Power Station.
Problem with a move far away would be it'd need to be approved by Chelsea Pitch Owners in order for the club to keep it's name. I understand a move within reason would be approved by the CPO, though.
Sorry, guys, back to City. Don't wanna change it to a CFC discussion!