Sterling - The Sun

[HelloCity]

Theyve crossed the line here. That is beyond disgraceful from them.

 

[bobbyowenquiff]

The campaign against Sterling is vicious. It is intended to destroy him and just what you should expect from a paper like the Sun. I haven't bought it since 1989 like many fans of my age group. City fans should get behind the lad. First half of last season he did well for us but as his confidence faded his performance has got worse. The story is two years old and the headline is a lie isn't it. He didn't step off a plane and insult anyone. What a disgrace.

 

[SilverFox2]

More damaging to the newspaper than it is to Sterling. 1.81 Million circulation as at May 2015. Annual decline of 13%.

That of course is the problem.
Like most newspapers circulation is falling so expect more of the same from all the media, they are all desperate to generate income.

 

[bert38]

I've made an official complaint to the Independent Press Standards Organisation. Enough is enough. City/Raheem need to act.

 

[chesterbells]

I've made an official complaint to the Independent Press Standards Organisation. Enough is enough. City/Raheem need to act.

Good man

 

[Blue Haze]

Is there any subject you're not a cock about?

And yet you keep reading them and replying. Is the ignore function too difficult for you to figure out, Pablito?

 

[andyhinch]

And yet you keep reading them and replying. Is the ignore function too difficult for you to figure out, Pablito?

Be hard to work out how much of a cock you are if he did

 

[Blue Haze]

Be hard to work out how much of a cock you are if he did

I don't know anything about that. Don't spend my time working out other men's cocks.

To each their own.

 

[andyhinch]

I don't know anything about that. Don't spend my time working out other men's cocks.
To each their own.[/QUOTE
Unfortunately I can't come back after a repost like that, now get back to the crayons

 

[capiloton]

i don't understand why City hierarchy always play nice with media scum.
ban those negative pricks from all City venue.

 

[Blue Haze]

Unfortunately I can't come back after a repost like that, now get back to the crayons

Crayons are more fun than getting angry that someone on the internet holds a different opinion. Good choice.

 

[franksinatra]

You can understand the club being reluctant, in some instances to challenge the papers, but this seems a perfect opportunity for the club to take action. Petty articles and snipes were bigger and too self-assured to bother to respond too but the vitriol and lies about one of our assets the club should defend. It would provide a sign of unity with the player and foster an even more positive relationship.

The Sun has given us an open goal, lets take it and possibly influence the future trash they would considering writing

 

[razman]

Sterling has to sue, pathetic paper

 

[capiloton]

it wonder me all of sudden his outspoken agent get silence once Sterling signed for City.
there must be an instruction from City, to ignore and keep silence.
if it's true, then City such a wimp. from players on the field and up to top management.
i just hope when Pep set foot in Manchester, he will be ruthless to those fuckers.

 

[andyhinch]

Crayons are more fun than getting angry that someone on the internet has a different opinion than you. Good choice.

I've never got angry on here once, well I did once TBH but that was a personal issue about a lost and well loved poster

 

[Phil1]

And yet you keep reading them and replying. Is the ignore function too difficult for you to figure out, Pablito?

I've never put anyone on ignore in the 5 years I've been on here and don't intend to start now.

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

I think we need to identify the 'writers' of these stories and wait for them to turn up at The Etihad and then tell them - 'YER BANNED'!

 

[stony]

I've never put anyone on ignore in the 5 years I've been on here and don't intend to start now.

I've only done it once and that's because the prick reported me and I got my first warning after ten years on here. The mard arse twat is staying on ignore too.

 

[Gaylord du Bois]

I've only done it once and that's because the prick reported me and I got my first warning after ten years on here. The mard arse twat is staying on ignore too.

Sorry about that, mate.

 

[Phil1]

I've only done it once and that's because the prick reported me and I got my first warning after ten years on here. The mard arse twat is staying on ignore too.

It's tempting pal, but it'd take away some of the enjoyment of being on here not reading the nonsense that makes me think about ignoring in the first place.
I imagine I'm on a couple of lists though.. :-)