mad4city said:There are some positives. It's a point more than we got at Stoke in our league winning season. .
No it's not....
mad4city said:There are some positives. It's a point more than we got at Stoke in our league winning season. .
Hmmmmm.......Noted.why me? said:Where is this so called sexy football they promised??
Worried!!
why me? said:Where is this so called sexy football they promised??
Worried!!
shadowyu said:Not as bad as everyone is making it sound. Not a good performance, but decent result considering all circumstances. Expectations seem to be a bit unrealistic and unadjusted from what we have seen thus far. Player by player:
- Exceeded expectations: Hart, Kolarov, Garcia, Rodwell, Milner (for me Milner was the best and saved our defence on a few occasions).
The rest didn't play well.
I agree, it's ridiculous for fans of the team that finished 5th, 3rd, 1st and 2nd in the last four seasons to expect a decent performance against a team likely to finish in the bottom half.shadowyu said:Not as bad as everyone is making it sound. Not a good performance, but decent result considering all circumstances. Expectations seem to be a bit unrealistic and unadjusted from what we have seen thus far. Player by player:
- Exceeded expectations: Hart, Kolarov, Garcia, Rodwell, Milner (for me Milner was the best and saved our defence on a few occasions).
The rest didn't play well.
the only way we're going to see sexy football is if the players grow handle-bar moustaches and wear leather shorts.why me? said:Where is this so called sexy football they promised??
Worried!!