Suarez

[unexpected item]

The journo that broke this is the same guy who broke the Bobby to Monaco story from the other week. It's the Guardian's Jamie Jackson who's the Manchester football correspondent and has just been on talkshite suggesting that we would swap Balo and Edin for him, but most of what he said sounded like guesswork to me.

The agenda part of my brain says he's getting fed stuff from rag HQ to undermine Bobby. Three guesses what the big question at tomorrow's press conference will be then...

 

[Joehannes]

The journo that broke this is the same guy who broke the Bobby to Monaco story from the other week. It's the Guardian's Jamie Jackson who's the Manchester football correspondent and has just been on talkshite suggesting that we would swap Balo and Edin for him, but most of what he said sounded like guesswork to me.

The agenda part of my brain says he's getting fed stuff from rag HQ to undermine Bobby. Three guesses what the big question at tomorrow's press conference will be then...

I'm not sure he broke either story.

 

[Pigeonho]

Saw the reports of £50m Suarez today. If we got him for that and Falcao went to someone else for less, i'd cry fucking buckets.

 

[unexpected item]

The journo that broke this is the same guy who broke the Bobby to Monaco story from the other week. It's the Guardian's Jamie Jackson who's the Manchester football correspondent and has just been on talkshite suggesting that we would swap Balo and Edin for him, but most of what he said sounded like guesswork to me.

The agenda part of my brain says he's getting fed stuff from rag HQ to undermine Bobby. Three guesses what the big question at tomorrow's press conference will be then...

I'm not sure he broke either story.

Well, he was claiming he did earlier, but then, it has to come from somewhere. It makes me laugh that it's been made such a fuss of by the media, probably cos Liverpool is somehow sacred to them.

 

[carlos tevez is a blue]

Saw the reports of £50m Suarez today. If we got him for that and Falcao went to someone else for less, i'd cry fucking buckets.

I'd cry fucking buckets if he joined, I never wanted Van Pussy because he's a pleb, I don't want Nani, the granny shagger at City and it has fuck all to do with their rag connections because I'd take Carrick, Valencia even Christiano!

 

[Pigeonho]

Saw the reports of £50m Suarez today. If we got him for that and Falcao went to someone else for less, i'd cry fucking buckets.

I'd cry fucking buckets if he joined, I never wanted Van Pussy because he's a pleb, I don't want Nani, the granny shagger at City and it has fuck all to do with their rag connections because I'd take Carrick, Valencia even Christiano!

Ronaldo's connections are irrelevant as it was years ago, not that it should matter anyway.
Carrick?!?!?

 

[carlos tevez is a blue]

Saw the reports of £50m Suarez today. If we got him for that and Falcao went to someone else for less, i'd cry fucking buckets.

I'd cry fucking buckets if he joined, I never wanted Van Pussy because he's a pleb, I don't want Nani, the granny shagger at City and it has fuck all to do with their rag connections because I'd take Carrick, Valencia even Christiano!

Ronaldo's connections are irrelevant as it was years ago, not that it should matter anyway.
Carrick?!?!?

Yep, good player, better than Garcia, Milner and Rodwell so would improve the team and is not a **** like the players I listed.

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

Saw the reports of £50m Suarez today. If we got him for that and Falcao went to someone else for less, i'd cry fucking buckets.

I'd cry fucking buckets if he joined, I never wanted Van Pussy because he's a pleb, I don't want Nani, the granny shagger at City and it has fuck all to do with their rag connections because I'd take Carrick, Valencia even Christiano!

Ronaldo's connections are irrelevant as it was years ago, not that it should matter anyway.
Carrick?!?!?

Yeah, we need a big thick useless fucker to sort out the smoking on the spirals at HT!!

 

[netnight]

<a class="postlink" href="http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/sport/football/manchester_city/s/1593757_manchester-city-rubbish-reports-of-luis-suarez-bid?rss=yes" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://menmedia.co.uk/manchesterevening ... id?rss=yes</a>

Manchester City rubbish reports of Luis Suarez bid

November 15, 2012

Manchester City have no plans to buy Liverpool striker Luis Suarez.

Reports in Thursday's papers suggested the Blues are readying a bid of up to £50m for the Anfield talisman.

But a senior source at City has confirmed that there is no interest from the Etihad Stadium.

With Liverpool languishing in 13th position, speculation is growing that manager Brendan Rodgers could be tempted to cash in on Suarez for the broader benefit of his squad.

City, meanwhile, have been linked with Atletico Madrid's Colombian striker Radamel Falcao.

At a press conference on Thursday Liverpool manager Brendan Rodgers knocked the reports down.

"There will be no bidding war. He's staying here," said the Northern Irishman.

"If we lost Luis then we've got no strikers. I don't think we can afford to lose anyone.

"He's certainly not someone we want to sell or move on.

"He's been a brilliant player to work with and we want to add to our squad, not take people out of it, especially a world-class player."

Suarez only signed a new long-term contract in the summer and while Rodgers knows he needs to strengthen his forward line in January he does not believe he has to do so in order to convince the South American to stay.

"We just continue to work and stay focused on what we try to achieve," added the Reds boss.

"Luis has already shown in the summer his commitment to the club, he's signed a new deal.

"I think you've seen up until this point he's in a great moment in his footballing life here at Liverpool: he is scoring goals and working well.

"I'll just continue to communicate with all the players and Luis in particular. Like I say, he's very happy here."

 

[Pam]

http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/sport/football/manchester_city/s/1593757_manchester-city-rubbish-reports-of-luis-suarez-bid?rss=yes

Manchester City rubbish reports of Luis Suarez bid

November 15, 2012

Manchester City have no plans to buy Liverpool striker Luis Suarez.

Reports in Thursday's papers suggested the Blues are readying a bid of up to £50m for the Anfield talisman.

But a senior source at City has confirmed that there is no interest from the Etihad Stadium.

Damn.
With Liverpool languishing in 13th position, speculation is growing that manager Brendan Rodgers could be tempted to cash in on Suarez for the broader benefit of his squad.

City, meanwhile, have been linked with Atletico Madrid's Colombian striker Radamel Falcao.

At a press conference on Thursday Liverpool manager Brendan Rodgers knocked the reports down.

"There will be no bidding war. He's staying here," said the Northern Irishman.

"If we lost Luis then we've got no strikers. I don't think we can afford to lose anyone.

"He's certainly not someone we want to sell or move on.

"He's been a brilliant player to work with and we want to add to our squad, not take people out of it, especially a world-class player."

Suarez only signed a new long-term contract in the summer and while Rodgers knows he needs to strengthen his forward line in January he does not believe he has to do so in order to convince the South American to stay.

"We just continue to work and stay focused on what we try to achieve," added the Reds boss.

"Luis has already shown in the summer his commitment to the club, he's signed a new deal.

"I think you've seen up until this point he's in a great moment in his footballing life here at Liverpool: he is scoring goals and working well.

"I'll just continue to communicate with all the players and Luis in particular. Like I say, he's very happy here."