I'm going of government figures. So someone is lying. Who'd have thought it
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 59,986
The government lying? I won’t have it. Those bastions of morality and truth?I'm going of government figures. So someone is lying. Who'd have thought it
west didsblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 32,299
Where’s the study that suggests more asylum seekers equates to higher crime and a lower quality of life?Affordable at what cost? Rising crime rates? Are you saying that less money should be at the expense of a lower quality of life?
Are you trolling me? The fact that the whole area goes down in price has causality. Investment stops, people move out of the area and companies and commercial shut up shop. Regardless of how you are trying to spin it.Where’s the study that suggests more asylum seekers equates to higher crime and a lower quality of life?
andyhinch
Well-Known Member
El george seems to have his finger on the pulse ;-)It's a fucking echo chamber in here these days.
Have any posters on here actually dealt with some of these economic migrants on the public service front line??
Do you actually really understand??
Do you really want 1,000s of men moving into areas without being fully vetted? The big issue for me is why Albania?The government lying? I won’t have it. Those bastions of morality and truth?
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 59,986
If they were 90% single men, they could process them immediately and deport them if they didn’t qualify.Do you really want 1,000s of men moving into areas without being fully vetted? The big issue for me is why Albania?
They aren’t 90% men as 75% are successful in their application either initially or through appeal.
I saw the article the other day, and I can't find it again. It stated 10% that's why we have full hotels and centres. And they are 90%, 89% to be exact. I'll get back to when I find out. Although it'll probably be out of date by then.If they were 90% single men, they could process them immediately and deport them if they didn’t qualify.
They aren’t 90% men as 75% are successful in their application either initially or through appeal.
west didsblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 32,299
No trolling from me. Where is the evidence of these drastic effects that asylum seekers have? From what I can see there is a marginal increase in property crime presumably because unprocessed asylum seekers are not allowed to work so they are likely to be more desperate. Conversely economic migrants that are allowed to work cause a marginal decrease in property crime. Leaving the EU and the cost of living crisis have had a much bigger impact on investment and companies shutting up shop. In fact the effect of asylum seekers is negligible in the scheme of things and barely measurable. If the government got their shit together and promptly processed their applications, those given permission to stay would be beneficial to the economy and those refused permission could be deported without us having to pay fortunes in accommodating them.Are you trolling me? The fact that the whole area goes down in price has causality. Investment stops, people move out of the area and companies and commercial shut up shop. Regardless of how you are trying to spin it.
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 59,986
It was never in date. I’d trust the figures coming out of the legal system more than any figure provided by this ghoul of a Home Secretary.I saw the article the other day, and I can't find it again. It stated 10% that's why we have full hotels and centres. And they are 90%, 89% to be exact. I'll get back to when I find out. Although it'll probably be out of date by then.