You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Swansea v Chelsea/Arse Vs West ham/Hazard incident
- Thread starter Ducado
- Start date
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader
Well-Known Member
The FArce are charging Hazard? What with? Whatever he did during the game ended in a red card and a three match ban. What else are the FArce upto? P'raps they should look again at Rooney's foul mouthings to referees or elbows to Wigan thoats!
oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
Blues star Hazard charged by FA
Chelsea's Eden Hazard is facing an extended ban for kicking out at a ball-boy after the FA charged him over his midweek sending-off at Swansea.
Belgian playmaker Hazard was already set to serve an automatic three-match suspension for his red card in Wednesday night's Capital One Cup semi-final second leg at the Liberty Stadium.
But the FA deemed that "insufficient" punishment for the offence, prompting an additional charge this afternoon.
An FA statement read: "The FA has charged Chelsea's Eden Hazard following his side's League Cup semi-final at Swansea on January 23, 2013.
"It is alleged that Hazard's behaviour in relation to a Swansea ball-boy, for which the player was dismissed in the 78th minute, constituted violent conduct whereby the standard punishment that would otherwise apply was clearly insufficient.
"The player has until 6pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013 to respond to the charge.
"The FA will remind all clubs of their responsibilities in ensuring ball-boys and other personnel around the pitch act in an appropriate manner at all times and will liaise with competitions accordingly."
I`m not in the least bit shocked and I said so at the time.A lesson to the rest of the teams in every league.
Chelsea's Eden Hazard is facing an extended ban for kicking out at a ball-boy after the FA charged him over his midweek sending-off at Swansea.
Belgian playmaker Hazard was already set to serve an automatic three-match suspension for his red card in Wednesday night's Capital One Cup semi-final second leg at the Liberty Stadium.
But the FA deemed that "insufficient" punishment for the offence, prompting an additional charge this afternoon.
An FA statement read: "The FA has charged Chelsea's Eden Hazard following his side's League Cup semi-final at Swansea on January 23, 2013.
"It is alleged that Hazard's behaviour in relation to a Swansea ball-boy, for which the player was dismissed in the 78th minute, constituted violent conduct whereby the standard punishment that would otherwise apply was clearly insufficient.
"The player has until 6pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013 to respond to the charge.
"The FA will remind all clubs of their responsibilities in ensuring ball-boys and other personnel around the pitch act in an appropriate manner at all times and will liaise with competitions accordingly."
I`m not in the least bit shocked and I said so at the time.A lesson to the rest of the teams in every league.
Follow
Charlie Morgan™@CHARLIEM0RGAN
Crazy 24 hours. Spoke to Hazard and I will not be pressing charges. Be in touch
edgecroft
Well-Known Member
ballboy shouldn't of done what he done. if ballboy hadn't of fell, then hazard wouldn't of kicked the ball. ballboy shouldn't of been in the way of the ball. so it's ballboy that would of caused it. fa are pricks, they shouldn't of upheld red card.
like the old saying, you can't of your cake and eat it too.
like the old saying, you can't of your cake and eat it too.
Barcon
Well-Known Member
edgecroft said:ballboy shouldn't of done what he done. if ballboy hadn't of fell, then hazard wouldn't of kicked the ball. ballboy shouldn't of been in the way of the ball. so it's ballboy that would of caused it. fa are pricks, they shouldn't of upheld red card.
like the old saying, you can't of your cake and eat it too.
Hazard had no reason to be going near the ball, the ballboy did.
Millwallawayveteran1988
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Sep 2010
- Messages
- 39,307
Why does Rooney always pop up in these threads?
Cellarite
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Jan 2010
- Messages
- 26,049
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Hazard's fault and he deserves everything he gets.<br /><br />-- Fri Jan 25, 2013 9:01 pm --<br /><br />
'Cos he's a ****,
Millwallawayveteran1988 said:Why does Rooney always pop up in these threads?
'Cos he's a ****,
r.soleofsalford
Well-Known Member
Barcon said:edgecroft said:ballboy shouldn't of done what he done. if ballboy hadn't of fell, then hazard wouldn't of kicked the ball. ballboy shouldn't of been in the way of the ball. so it's ballboy that would of caused it. fa are pricks, they shouldn't of upheld red card.
like the old saying, you can't of your cake and eat it too.
Hazard had no reason to be going near the ball, the ballboy did.
if city needed a win to stay in the cup and the ball boy had tried to waste time near city fans, the little shit would of been disemboweled and we`ed have ate his liver with some fava beans and a nice chianti.
Barcon
Well-Known Member
r.soleofsalford said:Barcon said:edgecroft said:ballboy shouldn't of done what he done. if ballboy hadn't of fell, then hazard wouldn't of kicked the ball. ballboy shouldn't of been in the way of the ball. so it's ballboy that would of caused it. fa are pricks, they shouldn't of upheld red card.
like the old saying, you can't of your cake and eat it too.
Hazard had no reason to be going near the ball, the ballboy did.
if city needed a win to stay in the cup and the ball boy had tried to waste time near city fans, the little shit would of been disemboweled and we`ed have ate his liver with some fava beans and a nice chianti.
I agree mate, it's that fucking Canadian that's wrong ;)