hgblue said:I can't understand why people struggle so much with the concept that you can be critical of a manager and still rate that manager very highly. It's not so difficult to grasp is it?
You're right. It's all about perceptions and opinions.
I was a kid in 1968 when City won the league. City were just about the best team in England during that period, and one of the best in Europe. Just three years earlier City were in the second division.
Happy days? For most of us, yes.
But even back then there was a sizeable minority called the "Main Stand Moaners" who were legendary for being ultra-critical of the team and club... Book... "too old"... Young... "too soft"... Coleman... "troublemaker"...
So in over 40 years we've have retained that freedom of speech and critical nous that has held us in such esteem over the years.
If people want to criticise while we're the champions of England, that's their choice... and if people now want to criticise while we are sat in our best league position in 30 years, that too is their choice.
I just prefer enjoying the moment. I was one of City's ultra-critical fans over these past dozen years... but now I'm surprisingly happy with my lot, and so now enjoy days out at Burnley and such like.
Nothing is ever perfect, so there is always ample opportunity to criticise, if that is your bag. We're all different.
I love Mancini, others don't. I hated Hughes, others didn't.
Que sera sera.