Terrorist attack on asylum centre

9eb56d689663591ee4dec845b69c3a60.jpg


When Nick Ferrari seems reasonable, you know that the caller is a nutter.
They look like ill-tempered sea bass to me.
 
It has been our answer for a century. From the Irish to West Indians to Asians and then East Europeans.

Our economy needs a constant flow of people. That’s how it works.

For context, the US relies on around 20 million illegal or undocumented people. Take them out and everything would grind to a halt.

Your completely ignoring the numbers of people now compared to say 100 years ago/ 50 years ago. Even in the 90s immigration was nowhere near the hundreds of thousands we see now. Infrastructure could actually cope and communities could properly integrate.

Ireland is a very unique example being so close to the uk - literally and culturally.

It’s in the last 10-15 years immigration levels have been very high compared to any other point.

There is no comparison to the US. Other countries in Europe perhaps

Genuine refugees need our help, but If you want to work here (economic migrant) come here legally. A huge number of people arriving on boats are not refugees and are abusing the system. We absolutely don’t need that and clearly can’t cope with it - refugees are now permanently living in hotels as there aren’t enough houses for them or local people.
 
Last edited:
Your completely ignoring the numbers of people now compared to say 100 years ago/ 50 years ago. Even in the 90s immigration was nowhere near the hundreds of thousands we see now. Infrastructure could actually cope and communities could properly integrate.

Ireland is a very unique example being so close to the uk - literally and culturally.

It’s in the last 10-15 years immigration levels have been very high compared to any other point.

There is no comparison to the US. Other countries in Europe perhaps

Genuine refugees need our help, but If you want to work here (economic migrant) come here legally. A huge number of people arriving on boats are not refugees and are abusing the system. We absolutely don’t need that and clearly can’t cope with it - refugees are now permanently living in hotels as there aren’t enough houses for them or local people.
How do you come here legally if you can’t get a passport in your own country?

Crossing on a dinghy is literally their only way of having their application for asylum heard.
 
Your completely ignoring the numbers of people now compared to say 100 years ago/ 50 years ago. Even in the 90s immigration was nowhere near the hundreds of thousands we see now. Infrastructure could actually cope and communities could properly integrate.

Ireland is a very unique example being so close to the uk - literally and culturally.

It’s in the last 10-15 years immigration levels have been very high compared to any other point.

There is no comparison to the US. Other countries in Europe perhaps

Genuine refugees need our help, but If you want to work here (economic migrant) come here legally. A huge number of people arriving on boats are not refugees and are abusing the system. We absolutely don’t need that and clearly can’t cope with it - refugees are now permanently living in hotels as there aren’t enough houses for them or local people.

What does no recourse to public funds mean do you think?

Asylum seekers do not have the right to work or the right to rent unless granted by the home office at its discretion.


You've already been told this but you repeat the same bollocks.
 
Your completely ignoring the numbers of people now compared to say 100 years ago/ 50 years ago. Even in the 90s immigration was nowhere near the hundreds of thousands we see now. Infrastructure could actually cope and communities could properly integrate.

Ireland is a very unique example being so close to the uk - literally and culturally.

It’s in the last 10-15 years immigration levels have been very high compared to any other point.

There is no comparison to the US. Other countries in Europe perhaps

Genuine refugees need our help, but If you want to work here (economic migrant) come here legally. A huge number of people arriving on boats are not refugees and are abusing the system. We absolutely don’t need that and clearly can’t cope with it - refugees are now permanently living in hotels as there aren’t enough houses for them or local people.

There was a lot of hostility towards immigrants in days gone by, arguably much more then there is today, so there wasn’t a great deal of integration.

Our infrastructure is not fit for purpose (housing, railways, water), it requires investment and the more we let it rot, the more it will cost to put right. We have a labour shortage, especially in the areas such as health and hospitality. The Govt is actively recruiting nurses from overseas - the tension in Govt is between those who want to reduce immigration for ideological reasons (the UKIPers) and those who recognise the economic reality of our situation.

You are hopelessly wrong on refugees, but I suspect that is by design.
 
Did they not fancy stopping in any of the dozens of countries they passed through on their quest to find the land of plenty?

I've always found this argument utterly fucking baffling.

The glaringly obvious is that most don't arrive here; relative to the rest of Europe we have very few arriving on our shores.

The other glaringly obvious thing is that those that do make the journey here aren't stopping in other countries en route because the UK is their intended destination.

If you jump on a train from Manchester with the intention to go to London, you ain't gonna get off in Birmingham even though the train is stopping there.
Because that would be idiotic if your intended destination is London.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.