Tevez - Whats the latest?

I suspect he's rather enjoyed me acknowledging his existence for the first time in years. Of course, like all cowards, he ran a mile when fronted out. Reminds me of a meercat nipping at a lion's tail then running for cover when he turns on him.

Sorry to have taken the thread off track. That's me done with Yellow Johnny.
 
Didsbury Dave said:
the goats backside said:
Didsbury Dave said:
Sweet Jesus, I've just done something scary.

Click on "Search". Put "Johnny Crossan" as the author and "Dave" as the search.

The 53 mentions in the last few weeks doesn't even take into account when you refer to me as "DD", which won't go into the search engine.

Madness, "It must be love, love, love"

Love can turn to obsession when one lover is spurned.

I'm getting a bit nervous about this.



best bet then would be to ignore it rather than keep posting about it, although it does sound a little bit like you might be enjoying his attention, just saying like
 
The Fat el Hombre said:
Danamy said:
The bid from Corinthians was very real and was close to completion, certain things happened and City vetoed the deal instantly.

All i can say is the spin that was put on it about payments was a load of bollox to say the least.................

Wonder what the 'certain things happened' were for us to instantly cancel a deal that would have seen us get £40 million for a player who wanted out of the club. I s'pose it was £10 million less than we wanted, but unless these 'certain things' were very serious then it's already looking like a bad decision

No worries F el H

It was probably the best decision City made all summer, taking into consideration the ways things are panning out at the moment...............
 
Danamy said:
The Fat el Hombre said:
Danamy said:
The bid from Corinthians was very real and was close to completion, certain things happened and City vetoed the deal instantly.

All i can say is the spin that was put on it about payments was a load of bollox to say the least.................

Wonder what the 'certain things happened' were for us to instantly cancel a deal that would have seen us get £40 million for a player who wanted out of the club. I s'pose it was £10 million less than we wanted, but unless these 'certain things' were very serious then it's already looking like a bad decision

No worries F el H

It was probably the best decision City made all summer, taking into consideration the ways things are panning out at the moment...............

im curious now.
 
JoeMercer'sWay said:
Danamy said:
The Fat el Hombre said:
Wonder what the 'certain things happened' were for us to instantly cancel a deal that would have seen us get £40 million for a player who wanted out of the club. I s'pose it was £10 million less than we wanted, but unless these 'certain things' were very serious then it's already looking like a bad decision

No worries F el H

It was probably the best decision City made all summer, taking into consideration the ways things are panning out at the moment...............

im curious now.


don't be, I can guarantee you that City would have snatched their hands off for £40M, but they NEVER CAME CLOSE to raising that level of dosh
 
JoeMercer'sWay said:
Danamy said:
The Fat el Hombre said:
Wonder what the 'certain things happened' were for us to instantly cancel a deal that would have seen us get £40 million for a player who wanted out of the club. I s'pose it was £10 million less than we wanted, but unless these 'certain things' were very serious then it's already looking like a bad decision

No worries F el H

It was probably the best decision City made all summer, taking into consideration the ways things are panning out at the moment...............

im curious now.
Was curious anyway, now I am intrigued as to how not selling him in the summer was a bonus.
 
Didsbury Dave said:
I suspect he's rather enjoyed me acknowledging his existence for the first time in years. Of course, like all cowards, he ran a mile when fronted out. Reminds me of a meercat nipping at a lion's tail then running for cover when he turns on him.

Sorry to have taken the thread off track. That's me done with Yellow Johnny.

He surely must have as you are SO important in the grand scheme of things.

If you want to do a search why not cross reference yourself with Mancini. You are equally as obsessed with him as you state JC is with you.
 
robbieh said:
Didsbury Dave said:
I suspect he's rather enjoyed me acknowledging his existence for the first time in years. Of course, like all cowards, he ran a mile when fronted out. Reminds me of a meercat nipping at a lion's tail then running for cover when he turns on him.

Sorry to have taken the thread off track. That's me done with Yellow Johnny.

He surely must have as you are SO important in the grand scheme of things.

If you want to do a search why not cross reference yourself with Mancini. You are equally as obsessed with him as you state JC is with you.

Search found 1174 matches

Search term used: mancini
 
robbieh said:
Didsbury Dave said:
I suspect he's rather enjoyed me acknowledging his existence for the first time in years. Of course, like all cowards, he ran a mile when fronted out. Reminds me of a meercat nipping at a lion's tail then running for cover when he turns on him.

Sorry to have taken the thread off track. That's me done with Yellow Johnny.

He surely must have as you are SO important in the grand scheme of things.

If you want to do a search why not cross reference yourself with Mancini. You are equally as obsessed with him as you state JC is with you.



put johnny crossan and didsbury dave into youtube and you get "didsbury dave pines for mark hughes", maybe thats why he is not keen on mancini, and yes he is SO very important in the scheme of things, I think it was homself who said it
 
robbieh said:
Didsbury Dave said:
I suspect he's rather enjoyed me acknowledging his existence for the first time in years. Of course, like all cowards, he ran a mile when fronted out. Reminds me of a meercat nipping at a lion's tail then running for cover when he turns on him.

Sorry to have taken the thread off track. That's me done with Yellow Johnny.

He surely must have as you are SO important in the grand scheme of things.

If you want to do a search why not cross reference yourself with Mancini. You are equally as obsessed with him as you state JC is with you.


You woman :-)
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.