crystal_mais said:
PJMCC1UK said:
very interesting read. Sure PB summarised this earlier
I hadn't seen that particular piece but funnily enough I was just re-reading her autobiography to refresh my memory and was just on the Miners Strike. Those self-same figures were quoted there as well so I think whoever wrote that blog picked those up from the book.
It (the book) talks about Scargill's guile and Ian Macgregor's lack of it. At one point, after the strike started, the NCB and NUM held their first meeting. No one but Scargill was allowed to speak for the NUM and he reiterated his opposition to pit closures other than on the grounds of exhaustion or geological reasons and that unless the NCB agreed to this, there was nothing more to say.
At that point, Macgregor suggested that they should keep the lines of communication open between a small group but Scargill said that he would only talk if they agreed to his pre-condition of pit closures. Naturally the NCB refused to do that and the talks ended. As they got up, Scargill apaprently asked if the NUM could continue to use that room for a private discussion and Macgregor agreed as it seemed a reasonable request. So the NCB team went out and spoke to the waiting media
However, when the NUM finally left the room and met the waiting media, Scargill then claimed the NCB had refused to meet any of their requests and had walked out.
The other interesting thing is that they had put together a very generous redundancy package and (according to Thatcher) did not anticipate any compulsory redundancies needing to be made, as they calculated that the required job losses would all be met by voluntary redundancy, mainly involving the men who'd done 30 years and would have been retiring soon anyway. Any sensible union leader might well have huffed and puffed and won some extra concessions but would have ultimately agreed on the basis of no compulsory redundancies. But not our Arthur. He wanted a fight.