The Agenda (Merged)

[franksinatra]

Re: so this agenda thing.

No Silva (West Ham), No Aguero (take your pick) in those top goals.

Rag & Chelsea love in.

Finally a mention for Aguero from Carragher.

Finally a mention? Carragher described him as the only player in the Premier League who was World class and could get in a world 11. Which Neville then agreed with. I can only presume you wrote this before the end of the show?
The team was a joke though.

 

[mat]

Re: so this agenda thing.

Some cock rubbing on BBC News over the dippers win.

 

[Blue Punter]

Re: so this agenda thing.

No Silva (West Ham), No Aguero (take your pick) in those top goals.

Rag & Chelsea love in.

Finally a mention for Aguero from Carragher.

Finally a mention? Carragher described him as the only player in the Premier League who was World class and could get in a world 11. Which Neville then agreed with. I can only presume you wrote this before the end of the show?
The team was a joke though.

I said "finally a mention" for Aguero as it was said towards the end of the piece.

What part of the team did you think was a joke? Would you care to comment why the goals I mentioned above were not in the goals of the season - so far?

 

[franksinatra]

Re: so this agenda thing.

No Silva (West Ham), No Aguero (take your pick) in those top goals.

Rag & Chelsea love in.

Finally a mention for Aguero from Carragher.

Finally a mention? Carragher described him as the only player in the Premier League who was World class and could get in a world 11. Which Neville then agreed with. I can only presume you wrote this before the end of the show?
The team was a joke though.

I said "finally a mention" for Aguero as it was said towards the end of the piece.

What part of the team did you think was a joke? Would you care to comment why the goals I mentioned above were not in the goals of the season - so far?

I thought Silva should have been in the team. The goals are personal preferences, many goals could be considered worthy of inclusion. Personally I was not a massive fan of Di Marias and would have gone for Jagielkas due to the timing, size of the game and the fact he is a defender by trade.

 

[Blue Punter]

Re: so this agenda thing.

Finally a mention? Carragher described him as the only player in the Premier League who was World class and could get in a world 11. Which Neville then agreed with. I can only presume you wrote this before the end of the show?
The team was a joke though.

I said "finally a mention" for Aguero as it was said towards the end of the piece.

What part of the team did you think was a joke? Would you care to comment why the goals I mentioned above were not in the goals of the season - so far?

I thought Silva should have been in the team. The goals are personal preferences, many goals could be considered worthy of inclusion. Personally I was not a massive fan of Di Marias and would have gone for Jagielkas due to the timing, size of the game and the fact he is a defender by trade.

I'm sure we all have our ultimate favourite in terms of best goal. Back to the second question I asked in my post:

Would you care to comment why the goals I mentioned above (Silva - West Ham & Sergio - take your pick) were not in the goals of the season - so far?

 

[franksinatra]

Re: so this agenda thing.

I said "finally a mention" for Aguero as it was said towards the end of the piece.

What part of the team did you think was a joke? Would you care to comment why the goals I mentioned above were not in the goals of the season - so far?

I thought Silva should have been in the team. The goals are personal preferences, many goals could be considered worthy of inclusion. Personally I was not a massive fan of Di Marias and would have gone for Jagielkas due to the timing, size of the game and the fact he is a defender by trade.

I'm sure we all have our ultimate favourite in terms of best goal. Back to the second question I asked in my post:

Would you care to comment why the goals I mentioned above were not in the goals of the season - so far?

If I had an opinion on that I would have done so in my initial response. If Silvas had been included it would have been a worthy choice. I think Pelles of the top of my head could have been a serious contender also. So you think the fact it was not chosen suggests an agenda by Caragher/Neville?

 

[Blue Punter]

Re: so this agenda thing.

I thought Silva should have been in the team. The goals are personal preferences, many goals could be considered worthy of inclusion. Personally I was not a massive fan of Di Marias and would have gone for Jagielkas due to the timing, size of the game and the fact he is a defender by trade.

I'm sure we all have our ultimate favourite in terms of best goal. Back to the second question I asked in my post:

Would you care to comment why the goals I mentioned above were not in the goals of the season - so far?

If I had an opinion on that I would have done so in my initial response. If Silvas had been included it would have been a worthy choice. I think Pelles of the top of my head could have been a serious contender also. So you think the fact it was not chosen suggests an agenda by Caragher/Neville?

Or you hoped that I wouldn't have asked you again and you could have conveniently sidestepped the issue by discussing the merits of the goals from Di Maria and Jagielka. Which was not what was asked. I'm amazed that you wrote an opinion on what was the best of those two, but didn't engage when specifically asked, in what I (and most other people) would find glaring omissions.

I'd suggest that list of 20 best goals of the season was put together by someone at SKY. JC & GN were merely commenting on what was presented to them. What I don't understand is how such a collection of goals could not include Silva's or Aguero's.

What possible reason do you think there could be for this glaring oversight?

 

[andyhinch]

Re: so this agenda thing.

Not seen Bill for a bit, FBI ?

 

[franksinatra]

Re: so this agenda thing.

I'm sure we all have our ultimate favourite in terms of best goal. Back to the second question I asked in my post:

Would you care to comment why the goals I mentioned above were not in the goals of the season - so far?

If I had an opinion on that I would have done so in my initial response. If Silvas had been included it would have been a worthy choice. I think Pelles of the top of my head could have been a serious contender also. So you think the fact it was not chosen suggests an agenda by Caragher/Neville?

Or you hoped that I wouldn't have asked you again and you could have conveniently sidestepped the issue by discussing the merits of the goals from Di Maria and Jagielka. Which was not what was asked. I'm amazed that you wrote an opinion on what was the best of those two, but didn't engage when specifically asked, in what I (and most other people) would find glaring omissions.

I'd suggest that list of 20 best goals of the season was put together by someone at SKY. JC & GN were merely commenting on what was presented to them. What I don't understand is how such a collection of goals could not include Silva's or Aguero's.

What possible reason do you think there could be for this glaring oversight?

No I am happy to discuss anything. Firstly I did not see the list of 20 I had just flicked on when discussing the merits of the two contenders. Personally I would have expected Silva's and Aguero's at Sunderland comfortably within this list. I am surprised they were not. I would be interested to know who the twenty were now.

Reasons for the glaring oversight? I can only think personal preference or like you say a shocking oversight. Not quite sure what Sky would gain by not including them? Why do you think they are not included?

 

[Blue Punter]

Re: so this agenda thing.

If I had an opinion on that I would have done so in my initial response. If Silvas had been included it would have been a worthy choice. I think Pelles of the top of my head could have been a serious contender also. So you think the fact it was not chosen suggests an agenda by Caragher/Neville?

Or you hoped that I wouldn't have asked you again and you could have conveniently sidestepped the issue by discussing the merits of the goals from Di Maria and Jagielka. Which was not what was asked. I'm amazed that you wrote an opinion on what was the best of those two, but didn't engage when specifically asked, in what I (and most other people) would find glaring omissions.

I'd suggest that list of 20 best goals of the season was put together by someone at SKY. JC & GN were merely commenting on what was presented to them. What I don't understand is how such a collection of goals could not include Silva's or Aguero's.

What possible reason do you think there could be for this glaring oversight?

No I am happy to discuss anything. Firstly I did not see the list of 20 I had just flicked on when discussing the merits of the two contenders. Personally I would have expected Silva's and Aguero's at Sunderland comfortably within this list. I am surprised they were not. I would be interested to know who the twenty were now.

Reasons for the glaring oversight? I can only think personal preference or like you say a shocking oversight. Not quite sure what Sky would gain by not including them? Why do you think they are not included?

I could add the Aguero goal v QPR, which would make it THREE glaring oversights. Interesting that these three omissions were all scored by City players. The strange thing is, SKY are usually shit hot on these sort of montages.

It must be a succession of unfortunate co-incidences. That's probably the most logical explanation.