The Agenda (Merged)

Status
Not open for further replies.
A City fan on talkshite last night asked Cundy if he thought City were getting the recognition they deserved.
I don't think the blue on the other end realised just how smarmy and condescending the cockney **** was being when he said "Yes, they have got all the recognition they deserve."
 
CelesteItis said:
SilverFox2 said:
Not sure if the refs are taking their perceived anti City Agenda too much to heart or not but the ex ref Mr Poll has some scathing remarks regarding the quality of current PL refs. (see Daily Mail).

He blames Mike Riley (Chief Ref) for so many incorrect big decisions over festive period and claims he would have been sacked if he was a Club Manager.

That's the actual agenda. The cartel devised it to protect their clubs. Everything is aligned with this, like an strategic business plan, has its milestones and goals.

Refs blatantly helping the scum back to champions league. Without their help the scum would be comfortably sitting at mid table. Whilst our lads are kicked all over the park and carded for being fouled, offside goals, non penalties awarded to us. Without the refs agenda City should be 5 to 7 points clear on top.

The media wanking over the scum title credentials, not a reference to a single penny they've spent. And Vadge is a tactical genius. Mourinho another tactical genius who won the title last september. Not a mention of the 9 points gap silently undermined.

The media has to belittle City's achievements because they won't fit the pro scum narrative, nor the cartel's sorry excuse for the unFuckingFairPlay rules.

BUT, it is good to be under the radar, just like Jaws, and when they realised too fuckin late... the title stayed at home.

Have to assume you feel there is an Agenda then ?

Seems the refs are doing a bit of practising incorrect decisions in games where City are not involved though ?
 
SilverFox2 said:
CelesteItis said:
SilverFox2 said:
Not sure if the refs are taking their perceived anti City Agenda too much to heart or not but the ex ref Mr Poll has some scathing remarks regarding the quality of current PL refs. (see Daily Mail).

He blames Mike Riley (Chief Ref) for so many incorrect big decisions over festive period and claims he would have been sacked if he was a Club Manager.

That's the actual agenda. The cartel devised it to protect their clubs. Everything is aligned with this, like an strategic business plan, has its milestones and goals.

Refs blatantly helping the scum back to champions league. Without their help the scum would be comfortably sitting at mid table. Whilst our lads are kicked all over the park and carded for being fouled, offside goals, non penalties awarded to us. Without the refs agenda City should be 5 to 7 points clear on top.

The media wanking over the scum title credentials, not a reference to a single penny they've spent. And Vadge is a tactical genius. Mourinho another tactical genius who won the title last september. Not a mention of the 9 points gap silently undermined.

The media has to belittle City's achievements because they won't fit the pro scum narrative, nor the cartel's sorry excuse for the unFuckingFairPlay rules.

BUT, it is good to be under the radar, just like Jaws, and when they realised too fuckin late... the title stayed at home.

Have to assume you feel there is an Agenda then ?

Seems the refs are doing a bit of practising incorrect decisions in games where City are not involved though ?

There is an Agenda.

It works in two ways that complement each other: against City and the other pro scum/cartel clubs.

The cartel was comfortable with the scum recognized and referred to as "Manchester". Suddenly City enters stage left crashing their party, next the agenda is set. Part of it is refs favouring the cartel teams and reffing not so subtly against City. The incompetent reffing in another games though is just plain incompetence, unless the scum is involved fixtures ahead.
 
CelesteItis said:
SilverFox2 said:
CelesteItis said:
That's the actual agenda. The cartel devised it to protect their clubs. Everything is aligned with this, like an strategic business plan, has its milestones and goals.

Refs blatantly helping the scum back to champions league. Without their help the scum would be comfortably sitting at mid table. Whilst our lads are kicked all over the park and carded for being fouled, offside goals, non penalties awarded to us. Without the refs agenda City should be 5 to 7 points clear on top.

The media wanking over the scum title credentials, not a reference to a single penny they've spent. And Vadge is a tactical genius. Mourinho another tactical genius who won the title last september. Not a mention of the 9 points gap silently undermined.

The media has to belittle City's achievements because they won't fit the pro scum narrative, nor the cartel's sorry excuse for the unFuckingFairPlay rules.

BUT, it is good to be under the radar, just like Jaws, and when they realised too fuckin late... the title stayed at home.

Have to assume you feel there is an Agenda then ?

Seems the refs are doing a bit of practising incorrect decisions in games where City are not involved though ?

There is an Agenda.

It works in two ways that complement each other: against City and the other pro scum/cartel clubs.

The cartel was comfortable with the scum recognized and referred to as "Manchester". Suddenly City enters stage left crashing their party, next the agenda is set. Part of it is refs favouring the cartel teams and reffing not so subtly against City. The incompetent reffing in another games though is just plain incompetence, unless the scum is involved fixtures ahead.

The long missed football is fixed blog covered most of it. In hindsight had a lot of truth.

Watch the FA cup matches this weeks and note the difference the way the "Elite" refs manage the matches.
 
Don't buy papers these days, but with a 6 car queue at the car wash I invested 30p in a copy of the I, Two items each for City and United.
Headlines read as follows.
United 1, "United survive bruising test to stretch their unbeaten run".
United 2 "Van Gaal relieved with battling point".
City 1 "Lampard ignores club tug-of-war to clinch victory for sloppy City".
City 2 " Pellegrini refuses to clarify future of midfielder to NYC fans anger".



No comment is all that needs to be said.
 
dawlish dave said:
Don't buy papers these days, but with a 6 car queue at the car wash I invested 30p in a copy of the I, Two items each for City and United.
Headlines read as follows.
United 1, "United survive bruising test to stretch their unbeaten run".
United 2 "Van Gaal relieved with battling point".
City 1 "Lampard ignores club tug-of-war to clinch victory for sloppy City".
City 2 " Pellegrini refuses to clarify future of midfielder to NYC fans anger".



No comment is all that needs to be said.

Actually I see it as a compliment to City.

We are expected to perform with professionalism at all levels so when we let in 2 goals at home for the second successive time we are rightly called sloppy and the backlash from Citys innovation to use Frank is still a novelty whereas MUFC have spiralled down to become shadows of their former selves.
They are no longer invincible and need every bit of encouragement to get back up to aspire to former glories.

Unfortunately this is the price of success, you are expected to be at the peak of our capabilities at all times, mere mortals need to be patted on the head for their lesser achievements.

Incidentally are we really happy that we let both Burnley and Sunderland score twice each at home ?
 
dawlish dave said:
Don't buy papers these days, but with a 6 car queue at the car wash I invested 30p in a copy of the I, Two items each for City and United.
Headlines read as follows.
United 1, "United survive bruising test to stretch their unbeaten run".
United 2 "Van Gaal relieved with battling point".
City 1 "Lampard ignores club tug-of-war to clinch victory for sloppy City".
City 2 " Pellegrini refuses to clarify future of midfielder to NYC fans anger".



No comment is all that needs to be said.

We were sloppy, we conceded a two goal lead for the second game in a row.

United are not title contenders so to stretch the unbeaten run is an achievement.
 
blueste41 said:
dawlish dave said:
Don't buy papers these days, but with a 6 car queue at the car wash I invested 30p in a copy of the I, Two items each for City and United.
Headlines read as follows.
United 1, "United survive bruising test to stretch their unbeaten run".
United 2 "Van Gaal relieved with battling point".
City 1 "Lampard ignores club tug-of-war to clinch victory for sloppy City".
City 2 " Pellegrini refuses to clarify future of midfielder to NYC fans anger".



No comment is all that needs to be said.

We were sloppy, we conceded a two goal lead for the second game in a row.

United are not title contenders so to stretch the unbeaten run is an achievement.

After spending over £150M in the summer and having the most expensive team in PL history they should be title contenders.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.