bainy said:
[/b]
Fair enough and apologies and all that... but, city are getting slagged off left right and centre. Every media outlet see's citys glass as half empty. Your opening post on a big city forum had that same negative view IMO. All beit your points may be valid.
There are 2 issues that need to be separated for me 1; The performances and league / cup progress
2; Treatment of football fans.
I would prefer they were kept separate and and off topic, allowing the fabulous improvement in MCFC football to take centre stage.
I agree. They're separate issues, so why you decided to label me one of
negative drones I'll never know.
Being a fan of my club shouldn't exclude me from criticising them, especially when in this case it comes to their treatment of us. The fans.
If we're passive, they can do as they please, and shit all over us in the process. Fuck knows what they might try to introduce if they gathered that we'd just roll over and accept whatever they proposed.
People need to be less selfish and stop looking after number one. We need to look at ourselves as a collective, we're not individuals, we're a collective.
That's the reason the fans in Germany have rights, and their clubs know where the line is drawn.
And it's the same reason clubs in this country couldn't give a flying fuck about their fans.
Get your thinking cap on.
-- Sat Feb 26, 2011 2:32 am --
WNRH said:
I don't think i have IMO. It says "The ownership of a Club like Manchester City, carries a unique set of obligations to the fans" so surely those oligations should be no matter how succesful we are, those who have followed the club through thick and thick and the fans who keep this club going every year that allowed them the oppourtunity to buy us should be able to watch a newer improved City for an affordable price.
I don't think replacing those fans who have stuck with the club through thick and thick with rich out of towners or city type people who can afford any price to watch us is keeping a unique set of obligations to the fans which in his words is not taken lightly.
I agree with you entirely mate, I just don't think the quote implied that. I hope I'm wrong though.