Quigg's a nice lad and good luck to him but I can't believe that some people have this fight as a pick em. I believe this is based purely on the over reaction to Quigg's fight v Martinez. Carl's available at 1.7 ish on the markets which for me is massive.
Rumour has it that Frampton is tight at the weight (LEIGHTON - any inside info ?? ) but ignoring that and just going on past fights I think Carl's a level above.
People are making a big deal of Quigg v Kiko. I thought Quigg looked troubled in the 1st rd, a lot moreso than you'd expect a genuine world class operator to. Him and Gallagher can bang on about setting a trap for Kiko and maybe they did but that trap did not involve looking out of his depth in the 1st rd.
People compare Quigg's quick stoppage of kiko with Frampton's much harder battles against Kiko and simplistically think it's a good formline. It isn't ...........
Frampton v Kiko 2 was in Sep2014. Kiko gave a really good acount of himself but lost decisively on points. He then had one keep busy fight before facing Quigg in July 2015. In the period between Sep14 and Jul15 Quigg had one notable victory over Otake - a good win but not one which enhanced his reputation massively. But, and here's the crucial piece of info, whereas Frampton's price at the off v Kiko was 1.5 ish, Quigg's price was 1.25ish. Ergo the market rated Quigg twice as likely as Carl to beat Kiko in their respective fights.
There was no talk of Kiko having a bad camp before quigg or of any injuries or personal troubles which may have affected him but still Quigg's price was so low because the market regarded Kiko as shot. Beating a shot fighter doesn't imo give Quigg near parity with Carl and hence I think the prices are all wrong.
I think Carl outboxes Quigg comprehensively and walks him on to one in the middle rounds.