JoeMercer'sWay said:
After Khan's demolition by Prescott I've a) always wanted and thought it should have been a requirement to have a rematch b) that Khan has being a dodger since, and he got lucky with Barrera's cut. Kotelnik and Salita were rubbish, Malignaggi has been round the block so to speak, so I've wanted to see him fight a proper puncher.
That's probably a bit unfair. 9 time sout of 10 Khan beats Prescott. He was careless and paid the price. There would have been a rematch with Prescott but he lost a bit of momentum, and he's now lost 2 of his last 4, both against fairly mediocre fighters. It's a difficult sell really as Khan has moved on a lot since then, and he's now with a much better trainer.
I don't think the 'dodging' element is really Khan's fault. That's just how Frank Warren operates, and you can't really blame him for it. If Hatton had have been in with a puncher at 21, it's unlikely he'd have gone on to make millions for himself and Frank. He protects his investment. In that respect, he's very similar to all other promoters.
Kudos to Khan for leaving Warren to seek the best fights out there anyway. Can't knock him for that.
Like i said earlier, his opposition has been pretty good over the last 2 years. What happened in the Barrera fight was unfortunate given that it ruined the fight. I don't see the outcome being any different anyway. Khan has every imaginable advantage over Barrera at this stage in their careers...barring experience of course.
He gets a lot of stick for the Salita win, but that again is unfair. He was an undefeated Mandatory challenger and basically he had to fight him. He took him out inside 1 round which is still impressive. It's too easy to look back in hindsight and simply say 'Salita is shit' but whilst he'll never be a world class fighter he is still capable.
Kotelnik is a good fighter. He came over to England a few years ago to fight Witter (when Witter was going well). I thought he was unlucky to lose (close decision). He's improved since then and he was excellent against Devon Alexander and was again very unlucky to lose (i thought he beat him personally). Alexander is very highly rated.
He also holds a close win over Marcos Maidana. Khan won every round against Kotelnik, so when you compare that with how the other 'world class' fighters have faired against him, it is pretty impressive.
As for Paulie, he was coming off two of the very best performances of his life (both against Juan Diaz) and was looking a much better fighter than the one who lost to Hatton and Cotto. He'd also dropped Buddy McGirt as his trainer and was obviously a better fighter for it. Again, Khan was probably more impressive than both Hatton and Cotto were.
Like i said, he's 23. There aren't really any other 23 year old fighters in the world with that sort of record. Koki Kameda and Devon Alexander are probably the only ones and they've both had fairly ordinary performances lately.