ono
Well-Known Member
Tyson was only at his best for a handful of his fights! You cant ignore the poor fights and losses! He gets hype because of the manner of victory in those early years but once it got tough he faded. No one talks about Holyfield being great but he had Tyson beat comfortabley!
He did have his number but this was after a 3 year prison spell.Tyson was only at his best for a handful of his fights! You cant ignore the poor fights and losses! He gets hype because of the manner of victory in those early years but once it got tough he faded. No one talks about Holyfield being great but he had Tyson beat comfortabley!
When Tyson came out, he badly needed the money and he was performing poorly in his tune up fights, but was ending them by spectacular KO which glossed over the performance. He was nowhere near ready to go in with Holyfield when he did, but needed to.
It's impossible to say how good he could have been. Everything changed after Cus died. He stopped training. The night before he lost to Douglas, he was in his hotel room with a cart load of strippers. People forget he technically should have won that fight. He put Douglas down and he was down for around 13 seconds. His prime years were basically wasted because he didn't live the life and he was destroying foes with such ease that he was hardly training, taking drugs etc.
On top of that he had the prison time. Holyfield and Lewis beat him comfortably but I don't think anyone can say with any certainty that they would have done the same thing when Tyson was anywhere near his best.
And for the record, everybody in boxing talks about Holyfield being great. He just slightly tainted his legacy with his performance enhancing drugs scandal.