The British Monarchy

Lovebitesandeveryfing said:
Doesn't it just? As a kid, was sitting on a gate minding my own business when this horse sauntered up to me and decided to test out whether my upper thigh was a nice, juicy apple. Hurt like fuck. They've got powerful jaws. I suppose I can consider myself lucky that he didn't try higher.
Click to expand...
was it just trying to give you a love bite? ;)
 
Brewster's millions said:
The King works everyday. Probably does more in a day than you do in a week.

Presumably you think the Royal Family’s extensive military service doesn’t count as work as well?

Silly boy.
Click to expand...
The only one who has put himself in dangerous situations with the military is the only one you royal arse lickers hate. Ironic really.
 
west didsblue said:
The only one who has put himself in dangerous situations with the military is the only one you royal arse lickers hate. Ironic really.
Click to expand...
I’ve never disputed what Prince Harry did during his military career. Don’t think anyone has actually.

Doesn’t mean that you can’t dislike or disagree with some of his behaviour since. There’s no contradiction between the two, so I’m afraid this is just another example of you spouting poorly thought through nonsense, as per. Nothing ironic about that.
 
Brewster's millions said:
I’ve never disputed what Prince Harry did during his military career. Don’t think anyone has actually.

Doesn’t mean that you can’t dislike or disagree with some of his behaviour since. There’s no contradiction between the two, so I’m afraid this is just another example of you spouting poorly thought through nonsense, as per. Nothing ironic about that.
Click to expand...
Never said you did.
You just went on about their “extensive military service” when the only one who fits into that category properly is the one you don’t like. The rest just dressed up and collected medals, in Prince Edward’s case that didn’t even include dressing up as a serviceman.
Not that I’m particularly anti-royal. I just don’t agree with holding them in higher regard than they deserve.
 
west didsblue said:
Andrew fan are we?

Having spoken to a couple of people who served with him, I know that he was kept well out of harms way and his exploits are more myth than reality.
Click to expand...
Not at all. Just pointing out that another member of the royal family served in the military during a conflict.
 
Brewster's millions said:
The King works everyday. Probably does more in a day than you do in a week.

Presumably you think the Royal Family’s extensive military service doesn’t count as work as well?

Silly boy.
Click to expand...
Works everyday .
What dragging horse face behind shaking a few daft twats hands while they wave their union jack flags eating cucumber sandwiches
 
west didsblue said:
Never said you did.
You just went on about their “extensive military service” when the only one who fits into that category properly is the one you don’t like. The rest just dressed up and collected medals, in Prince Edward’s case that didn’t even include dressing up as a serviceman.
Not that I’m particularly anti-royal. I just don’t agree with holding them in higher regard than they deserve.
Click to expand...
The King does have extensive military service. Even had command of his own ship. You might want to avail yourself of the facts.
 
west didsblue said:
How many armed conflicts did HMS Bronington take part in in 1976?
Click to expand...
None, because we didn’t have any armed conflicts in 1976, other than what was happening with the IRA and the Cod War. I don’t believe Iceland were laying mines during that period, although you may have some mates who know differently.

You need to do better than that I’m afraid. Or you could just admit that you haven’t a clue what you’re talking about.
 
west didsblue said:
Might have served in a conflict but he was kept out of harms way which was my point.
Click to expand...
No, your point was only Harry had served in an armed conflict. I pointed out that was not the case as Andrew had served in the Falkland conflict. Regardless of what he did or didn't do he was there as we're many others who won't have seen combat which is what you are alluding to about Andrew.
 
maxwellblue said:
No, your point was only Harry had served in an armed conflict. I pointed out that was not the case as Andrew had served in the Falkland conflict. Regardless of what he did or didn't do he was there as we're many others who won't have seen combat which is what you are alluding to about Andrew.
Click to expand...
No, my point was that Harry was the only one who was put in a dangerous situation. Read it back.
 
Brewster's millions said:
None, because we didn’t have any armed conflicts in 1976, other than what was happening with the IRA and the Cod War. I don’t believe Iceland were laying mines during that period, although you may have some mates who know differently.

You need to do better than that I’m afraid. Or you could just admit that you haven’t a clue what you’re talking about.
Click to expand...
Read what I posted rather than arguing against things I didn’t say.
 
Wills has a chest full of medals , it is ridiculous and dont even get me started on edward and his medals, it has to stop . If you earn the medals on the frontline in the forces that is all that fucking counts
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top