carlosthejackal
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Feb 2010
- Messages
- 4,821
Truth often hurtsAre you all in a Whatsapp group?
Truth often hurtsAre you all in a Whatsapp group?
Are you all in a Whatsapp group?
It must be very sore after reading so much nonsense ;-)Truth often hurts
No one allowed to criticise the monarchy?Are you all in a Whatsapp group?
I wondered the same, better kept encrypted and away from public view till the tumbrills start rolling.Why would we be posting it on here if we were in a WhatsApp group?
Positively encouraged in the democratic institutions of our constitutional monarchy but a privilege not permitted in many countries with elected heads of state you'll find - usually after they've abolished the apparatus that put them into power of course.No one allowed to criticise the monarchy?
Tsar Nicholas and Marie Antionette approve this post.Positively encouraged in the democratic institutions of our constitutional monarchy but a privilege not permitted in many countries with elected heads of state you'll find - usually after they've abolished the apparatus that put them into power of course.
Positively encouraged in the democratic institutions of our constitutional monarchy but a privilege not permitted in many countries with elected heads of state you'll find - usually after they've abolished the apparatus that put them into power of course.
Along with Stalin and Napoleon no doubt.Tsar Nicholas and Marie Antionette approve this post.
A cursory glance at any primary school history book explains the development of such totalitarian states although to be fair the Guardian would probably consider the information unsuitable for its readership.This isn't quite correct. By convention the royal family are not even discussed in parliament let alone the existence of it debated.
Redirect Notice
www.google.com
You seem to be confusing democratic republics with totalitarian states that hold sham elections.
A monarchy by another name is still a monarch. Or are we to believe that Kim Jong Un, third in his family to be president, isn’t a de facto king?Along with Stalin and Napoleon no doubt.
King Kim IIIA monarchy by another name is still a monarch. Or are we to believe that Kim Jong Un, third in his family to be president, isn’t a de facto king?
Life is best lived when you don’t look at history books but take the very small window we are given to make the best for ourselves and those close to us.A cursory glance at any primary school history book explains the development of such totalitarian states although to be fair the Guardian would probably consider the information unsuitable for its readership.
In contrast, all my beliefs are self generated:Life is best lived when you don’t look at history books……
everything you believe in is passed on, you don’t have your own mind.
Are you all in a Whatsapp group?
His inscrutable majesty may even keep their judiciary more independent than the US Supreme Court Orange Lickers. I half expected to see you in the cavalry riding over the hill but alas instead just another tumbril pusher it seems.King Kim III
'Experience is what we call our future mistakes - which are already recorded in the libraries of the world.' Karl PopperLife is best lived when you don’t look at history books but take the very small window we are given to make the best for ourselves and those close to us.
You are an obviously well read intelligent man, but everything you believe in is passed on, you don’t have your own mind.
Thereby relieving The Almighty of a heavy responsibility.In contrast, all my beliefs are self generated:...
Yep, there’s my point right there:'Experience is what we call our future mistakes - which are already recorded in the libraries of the world.' Karl Popper