Rascal
El Presidente
gordondaviesmoustache said:As far as I am aware every major conurbation in the world calculates its population from its 'greater' area.
The population of New York, for example, isn't just Manhatten, but also includes Queens, Brooklyn etc..
Manchester itself could not grow to any meaningful extent from the turn of the 19th Century as it was 'land-locked', so the surrounding towns have been absorbed into it. This is in contrast to US Cites such as LA and Chicago, for example, which have an extensive hinterland to expand into.
It is entirely right that the figures for Manchester include its satellite towns as they are very much a part of the city and its character. Certainly Salford, Oldham, Rochdale, Stockport (and dare I say it Stretford) and possibly Bolton should be included in the figures for Manchester's population, which on that basis is around 2 million.
Anybody who has ever studied how conurbations grow wll understand this. They grow around road and rail links in a a hub and spoke way. I could drive from Cheadle to probably near Horwich with no discernable coutryside and the only difference wold be Metropolitan district signs.
Satelite towns grow through there connection to the closest City, they provide workers and support industries to the Citys major industries.
We are in fact not far from what ants do
ants