bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
You have to wonder what he's after and what his motivation is. I'm assuming he's content with the report itself as he authored it. It then must be that BJ's action is not what he wants. Most organisations have procedures to deal with bullying and harassment (worth noting only one of those is actually illegal), and If it's not clear that Patel has committed some gross misconduct worthy of dismissal then I'd say it's down to her management (the PM) to decide what if any sanction or reprimand is appropriate. Unlike everyone else it seems I haven't seen the report so it's difficult to see what is / isn't right in this respect.
I'd guess he gave Johnson the report that Johnson then sat on for months and then decided to disregard. Allen has a long and illustrious career behind him and he has seen his view completely disregarded so has decided to publicly distance himself from Johnsons decision and resign. Its called honour and integrity but given the year this government has had you can be excused for failing to recognise it - even Mayday sacked the witch for breaking the code.