Citizen in Pakistan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 Aug 2012
- Messages
- 3,955
With the collective no show from our available attackers it was good point at scum, really hearting to see otem kompany partnership
Much as we like to deride the buggers they are still a top 4 side.We were playing United though
Agreed, but even if we had another striker on par with Aguero, with a possible 60 matches a season, I'm confident they'd both get more than enough games per season including internationals.If everyone is fit and we play a 4-2-3-1 we have Silva, Sterling, de Bruyne, Nasri, Navas and (depending on where you think he's best suited) Toure to deploy as attacking midfield players. In the defensive 2 there's the two Ferns, Delph and Toure. That's more than adequate strength in depth.
Up front is the problem but you won't get a player at or close to Aguero's level to sit on the bench waiting for an injury to get game time. I hope Iheanacho gets a full game on Wednesday so we can see what he can do in a competitive scenario.
Should have gone to Specsavers.Didn't see one half and half in our end
And I think that's part of the problem with the result yesterday; we are used to beating them and we have the better players even without Sergio, Dave, Samir, Fabian etc. Several of those previous games were absolute hammerings and even the 1-0 home win last season would have been more emphatic had the three nailed-on penalties been awarded. The 1-0 when Vince scored was also extremely one-sided.
Sorry but have to disagree.One cracking post on the caff that I saw that said because we'd been battered last season, we came for a point and showed them much more respect. This proved (to the poster at least) how much they'd come on as a team under the Turtle as we were much more frightened of them.
That is a RAWKish level of delusion.
I had a look at the their Player Ratings on the MuEN web site yesterday - De Gea was getting 8s - he didn't have anything to do other than deal with back passes so at best it should have been 6 - shows how deluded they all are.One cracking post on the caff that I saw that said because we'd been battered last season, we came for a point and showed them much more respect. This proved (to the poster at least) how much they'd come on as a team under the Turtle as we were much more frightened of them.
That is a RAWKish level of delusion.
Sorry but have to disagree.
Too many City fans said the opposite yesterday,that it showed how good the Rags were,because we GAINED a point,because we got hammered last season 4-2.
Now who is dissalusioned ??
I make no apologies for repeating myself yesterday,the Rags are a piss poor team.If I am wrong in your opinions then I wish you had been with me tonight at dominoes in Mid Cheshire with a load of Rag fans (some of whom are ST Holders and have been for years) who claim they are definitely NOT a top four team.
I`ll let you make of those comments what you will,but they are not a happy lot in the manner in which they set up,with acknowledging that that we had our best two players out.
Their lack of support for their Manager left a lot to be desired and all felt that they (as a team) were a long way behind City.
I think we're actually agreeing with each other matey. I'm saying the rag was deluded for claiming that they were so much better and had progressed. I'd say that they were just as frightened of us, playing two defensive midfielders at home, with no width apart from the full backs, against a team they scored four against last season and that had it's two most dangerous players missing.Sorry but have to disagree.
Too many City fans said the opposite yesterday,that it showed how good the Rags were,because we GAINED a point,because we got hammered last season 4-2.
Now who is dissalusioned ??
I make no apologies for repeating myself yesterday,the Rags are a piss poor team.If I am wrong in your opinions then I wish you had been with me tonight at dominoes in Mid Cheshire with a load of Rag fans (some of whom are ST Holders and have been for years) who claim they are definitely NOT a top four team.
I`ll let you make of those comments what you will,but they are not a happy lot in the manner in which they set up,with acknowledging that that we had our best two players out.
Their lack of support for their Manager left a lot to be desired and all felt that they (as a team) were a long way behind City.
Its took me nearly 36 hours after the match to clock that we kept another clean sheet with Vinny on the pitch.
The rags performance suggested to me its our title to lose.
Hopefully Arsenal will do their usual and implode around the New Year mark but I do agree that they will be our strongest challengers.I don't think the rags are our biggest challengers, I think Arsenal are, but I agree it's our title to lose.
It's not hard at all, there's a perfect place for him on the bench. Plus, imagine bringing Yaya on after 70 mins if you need a goal, he'll still have some energy to burst through a tired defence.I'm sure it's been said before but Sunday shows how hard it's going to be to find Yaya a place in our side for big games. He can't play in a 2 man midfield and isn't mobile enough for a number 10 or centre forward.
We lose a lot in terms of passing and control without him but we can be very exposed when he plays.
Sorry but have to disagree.
Too many City fans said the opposite yesterday,that it showed how good the Rags were,because we GAINED a point,because we got hammered last season 4-2.
Now who is dissalusioned ??
I make no apologies for repeating myself yesterday,the Rags are a piss poor team.If I am wrong in your opinions then I wish you had been with me tonight at dominoes in Mid Cheshire with a load of Rag fans (some of whom are ST Holders and have been for years) who claim they are definitely NOT a top four team.
I`ll let you make of those comments what you will,but they are not a happy lot in the manner in which they set up,with acknowledging that that we had our best two players out.
Their lack of support for their Manager left a lot to be desired and all felt that they (as a team) were a long way behind City.
Their was no half and half scarves where i was sat,going to spec savers wouldn't change that you sarcastic sod,also a few people singing a nursery rhyme is pretty shit, do you think we would ever allow them to drown us out at the Etihad?Should have gone to Specsavers.
There weren't as many as in previous years bit still quite a few. Someone was even shouting abuse at the wearers as they got up to the concourse. The most amusing thing (other than Shrek's £300k a week for four years) was that some rag clowns were buying them after the match as souvenirs of the worst derby for many years.
As for the rags not mustering one song; I think hearing aids are in order.
They weren't particularly loud, or tuneful, or remotely amusing, but they managed a few of the usual ditties.
The scenes outside were quite worrying: they seem to have even more tourists than usual and every time I walk past our main entrance before the game I fear we might go down the same route.
Whoa, forget this post match debate. Dominoes is one of the most underrated of pastimes.Sorry but have to disagree.
Too many City fans said the opposite yesterday,that it showed how good the Rags were,because we GAINED a point,because we got hammered last season 4-2.
Now who is dissalusioned ??
I make no apologies for repeating myself yesterday,the Rags are a piss poor team.If I am wrong in your opinions then I wish you had been with me tonight at dominoes in Mid Cheshire with a load of Rag fans (some of whom are ST Holders and have been for years) who claim they are definitely NOT a top four team.
I`ll let you make of those comments what you will,but they are not a happy lot in the manner in which they set up,with acknowledging that that we had our best two players out.
Their lack of support for their Manager left a lot to be desired and all felt that they (as a team) were a long way behind City.